Answer:
The best answer to the question: What part of Piaget´s theory is Trevor demonstrating, would be: symbolic thinking.
Explanation:
The development of cognitive capacities in both children and adults is a very interesting topic. How children think, how they reason and get to know the world and make sense of it is a topic that has been handled by several experts in psychology, but none as much as Jean Piaget, whose theories of child cognitive development have shaped up until now a lot of what we know about childhood development. In the case of Trevor, the three year old who is associating the action of going to work for his father, with going to the coffee shop, and thus ends up with the question if his father´s office is at the coffee shop, the part of Paiget´s theory that applies is symbolic thinking. Trevor has associated two concepts: his father going to work, and the coffee shop, and assigned them the idea that his father´s office is at the coffee shop, because that is where he sees his father going when he heads off to work. This is characteristic of symbolic meaning.
b. shifting cultivation
c. farmers that stay in one place
d. the lack of tractors and machinery
The Features of subsistence farming does not consider the use of pesticides.
Subsistence farming is defined as a variety of farming where every crops that were raised are applied to endorse the farmer and his or her family, with little, if any, surplus for sale or trade.
Subsistence farming was principally utilized by preindustrial agricultural populates all around the world. The main characteristics was that it uses to shifting cultivation, but not use the pesticides.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about the pesticides, refer to:
#SPJ2
The answer is indeed:
Answer:
C. 23
Explanation:
Executions and death sentences in the United States have remained at a historical low.
Since 1900, 23 people have been executed in one of the countries where the death penalty still prevails. The fall in the number of executions has to do with published data that reveal that 90% of the executions involved people with "significant evidence" of being in one of these groups: mental illness, intellectual disability, brain damage, severe trauma and in some cases, the group of the innocents.
Answer:
test-retest reliability
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described it can be said that the psychological construct missing from this intelligence test is test-retest reliability. This is a measure to see how reliable the results of a test are, and is done by administering the same test twice, after a set amount of time has passed. Such as the researcher has done in this scenario.
Answer: test-retest reliability
Explanation: In other to validate the outcome of a test or an experiment, researchers may often repeat a particular test more than once, in other to ensure that conclusion or inference drawn from the first or initial test aren't wrong. This is known as test-retest reliability. Test retest reliability involves, that the test retaken is performed under the the same condition as the first. This is to ensure that observed differences aren't due to changes in experimental conditions. In the context above, the test was conducted twice using the same participant and condition, in other to establish the validity or reliability of the first or initial test. Since the outcome of the first and second test do not conform, the intelligence test lacks test retest reliability.
b. monsoons
c. tornadoes
d. droughts
b. emphasis on tradition as a guide to action.
c. emphasis on reason as the means of discovering truth.
d. belief in the need for strong, authoritarian government