The answer is solvency or strategies
c. APR.
b. incentive.
d. grace period
Answer:
It is APR.
Explanation:
the dude who said grace period is stupid
B.Insurance plans with different premiums and deductibles let you decide how much financial loss you are willing to risk
C.Paying for health insurance is always cheaper than paying for your own medical expenses
D.None of the above
Answer:
Option C
Explanation:
The reason is that the health insurance plan helps the insurer to limit the risk of paying one off payment to contribute for his or her health so it can help to shift this risk to another party (Health Insurance Company) by contributing a small amount of money.
Furthermore, the insurance planning also helps in accepting the level of risk to shift to the insurance company and retain the risk share to itself because the person might think he will not face such risks in future.
The paying for health insurance might be more expensive than the original expense because their are chances that the person doesn't gets ill because he follows proper diet plans, is health conscious and take exercise daily. So paying for health insurance becomes a burden. So the option C is incorrect.
Answer:
The answer is C) Paying for health insurance is always cheaper than paying for your own medical expenses.
Explanation:
I took the quiz.
Answer:
(1) Pe =0.3Pm + 0.15 Pa
Pm = 0.7Pe + 0.2 Pm + 0.3 Pa
Pa = 0.3 Pe + 0.5Pm +0.55 Pa
(2) The free variable Pa = 100
Explanation:
Solution
We create a table of outputs using the given percentages economy distribution
Energy Manufacturing agriculture Purchased by
0 0.3 0.15 energy
0.7 0.2 0.3 manufacturing
0.3 0.5 0.55 Agriculture
Let Pe Pm, Pa represent the prices for each sector
We then create an income equation using the expenses of the table above
Now,
Pe =0.3Pm + 0.15 Pa
Pm = 0.7Pe + 0.2 Pm + 0.3 Pa
Pa = 0.3 Pe + 0.5Pm +0.55 Pa
Note: Kindly find an attached copy of part of the solution to the given question and complete question to of this exercise below
The question revolves around the concept of interdependence in an economy, involving the flow of goods and services amongst energy, manufacturing, and agricultural sectors. Each sector sells a calculated percentage of its output to the others, with any unsold output retained for internal use.
The question primarily deals with the concept of interdependence amongst different sectors in an economy, specifically within context of energy (e), manufacturing (m), and agriculture (a). The way these sectors interact with each other is through buying and selling their output. For instance, sector e sells 70% of its output to m and 30% to a. This suggests that e is providing input goods that are likely necessary for m and a's operations. Similarly, for the other sectors. The percentage not sold to other sectors is the retained output, contributing to their own reserves or consumption.
This kind of model is used to understand the flow of goods and services among sectors and the overall economic system.
#SPJ3
Answer:
A narrative summary should include a brief description of the key events and plot points in a story or piece of literature. It provides an overview of the main characters their motivations and the central conflict or problem they face. The narrative summary should capture the essence of the story giving readers an understanding of the overall structure and progression of events. It typically includes the beginning middle and end of the narrative highlighting important turning points or climactic moments. Essentially the narrative summary aims to condense the main storyline into a concise and engaging overview.
B. The desires and fears of a particular target market
C. Things that people consider necessary to maintain their lifestyle or quality of life
D. Things that people want to have in order to be happy and feel good
Answer:
c. Things that people consider necessary to maintain their lifestyle or quality of life.
Explanation:
b. Using a cap-and-tradeLOADING... system of tradable emission allowances will eliminate half of the sulfur dioxide pollution at a cost of $ nothing million per year.
c. If the permits are not tradable, what will be the cost of eliminating half of the pollution?
d. If permits cannot be traded, then the cost of the pollution reduction
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
a. The cost of eliminating is shown below:
= $275 × 20
= $5,500
b. The cost would be $375 per ton
c. In the case when the permits are not tradable so in this the cost is $5,500
d. In the case when the permits cannot be traded so the cost of the pollution reduction is
= $375 × 10 + $275 × 10
= $3,750 + $2,750
= $6,500