In countries in which new-life sustaining drugs cannot be patented, such drugs are sold at widely affordable prices; those same drugs, where patented, command premium prices because the patents shield patent-holding company from competitors. These facts show that future access to new life sustaining drugs can be improved if the practice of granting patents on newly developed life-sustaining drugs were to be abolished everywhere.Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) In countries in which life-sustaining drugs cannot be patented, their manufacturer is neverthless a profitable enterprise.

(B) Countries that do not currently grant patents on life-sustaining drugs are, for the most part, countries with large populations.

(C) In some countries specific processes for the manufacture of pharmaceutical drugs can be patented even in cases in which the drugs themselves cannot be patented.

(D) Pharmaceutical companies can afford the research that go into the development of new drugs only if patents allow them to earn high profits.

(E) Countries that grant patents on life-sustaining drugs almost always ban their importation from countries that do not grant such patents.

Answers

Answer 1

Answer:

Answer:

Explanation:

The facts written here shows that the future access to new life sustaining drugs can be improved if the practice of granting patent on newly developed drugs were to be abolished everywhere.

Of the following most seriously weakening argument is

(D) Pharmaceutical companies can afford the research that go into the development of new drugs only if patents allow them to earn high profits.

This answer hits the conclusion right in the sweet spot! Companies need the profit that the patents provide to enable research to create the "future access to new life sustaining drugs" that the author talks about directly the conclusion of the argument.

Related Questions

If you feel pain during weight training, what should you do?
What are three types of muscle fibers
Disengagement theory would believe which of the following? Group of answer choices Older people should remain in the work force as long as possible It’s crucial that old people have positive reinforcement Older people experience much prejudice Older people should leave the work force as soon as possible Older people benefit society by continuing to work.
When a disease is endemic to a country or region, it __________.a. frequently infects the population b. very rarely infects the population c. only infects adults in the population d. only infects children in the population
Which foods do not contain carbohydrates? strawberries oils potatoes beans

There are only two or three team sports that affect all the dimensions of 6.

Answers

The gambler's fallacy, also known as the Monte Carlo fallacy or the fallacy of the maturity of chances, is the mistaken belief that, if something happens more frequently than normal during some period, it will happen less frequently in the future, or that, if something happens less frequently than normal during some period, it will happen more frequently in the future (presumably as a means of balancing nature). In situations where what is being observed is truly random (i.e., independent trials of a random process), this belief, though appealing to the human mind, is false. This fallacy can arise in many practical situations although it is most strongly associated with gambling where such mistakes are common among players.

so in other words... in the humans mind we believe this belief to be false

Which describes a consequence of steriod abuse?

Answers

Basically, steroid abuse will create an unnatural excess of testosterone in our body, which may cause :

- Acne
An increase in testosterone will Trigger the hormones that is responsible in creating an acne

- Shrunken Testicles
Because our body is fulled with outside testosterone our brain give signal to our body to stop producing it, resulting in shrunken testicles

- Gynecomastia
or which commonly known as man-boob

- Baldness

Which of the following is not a lifestyle factor ?a. smoking cigarettes
b. having weak eyesight
c. having friends
d. walking to school

Answers

Having weak eye sight is not a lifestyle factor. Your life style is your choice. You choose to smoke, you choose to have friends, and you choose to walk to school. Having weak eye sight is involuntary.

Your answer is B. Having weak eyesight.

Hope this helps.

Amounts of water vitamins and minerals are absorbed in the