Answer: Option (c) is the correct answer.
Explanation:
It is known that a stronger element is able to displace a less stronger element in a chemical reaction.
And, according to the reactivity chart hydrogen is more reactive in nature than copper.
Therefore, when Cu is added to then there will be no reaction because copper is less reactive than hydrogen.
Thus, we can conclude that the reaction not proceed to a product because copper has a lower activity than hydrogen and cannot replace it.
The object is a satellite
Sun
The regions surrounding
the object are free from
debris
The object is triangular
in shape.
Planet
Not a Planet
2019 Edmentum All rights
Answer:
Planet: The object orbits the sun
Not planet: The object is a satellite
Planet: The regions surrounding the object are free from debris
Not Planet: The object is triangular in shape.
Explanation:
A planet is characterized as:
Spheroidal (or at least big enough to be round-ish)
It should orbit the sun (not other planets, so satellites like the moon is not considered as a planet)
It should have no debris, or cleared of debris around its orbit
Although there is now the dwarf planet category, it satisfies almost all charateristics to be considered a planet, except the cleared of debris part.
Answer:
Planet: The object orbits the sun
Not planet: The object is a satellite
Planet: The regions surrounding the object are free from debris
Not Planet: The object is triangular in shape.
Answer:
0.60 mol·L⁻¹
Explanation:
Data:
LiBr: c = 0.50 mol/L; V =300 mL
RbBr: c = 0.70 mol/L; V =300 mL
1. Calculate the moles of Br⁻ in each solution
(a) LiBr
(b) RbBr
2. Calculate the molar concentration of Br⁻
(a) Moles of Br⁻
n = 0.150 mol + 0.210 mol = 0.360 mol
(b) Volume of solution
V = 300 mL + 300 mL = 600 mL = 0.600 L
(c) Molar concentration
The concentration of Br ions in the resulting solution of LiBr and RbBr has been 0.6 M.
The addition of LiBr and RbBr has been dissociated into the equal moles of Li, Rb, and Br.
Thus 1 mole of LiBr = 1 mole Br
1 mole RbBr = 1 mole Br.
The moles of LiBr in 0.5 M solution:
Molarity =
0.5 =
Moles of LiBr = 0.15 mol
The moles of Br from LiBr = 0.15 mol.
The moles of RbBr in 0.7 M solution:
Molarity =
0.7 =
Moles of RbBr = 0.21 mol
The moles of Br from RbBr = 0.21 mol.
The total moles of Br ions from LiBr and RbBr has been :
= 0.15 + 0.21
= 0.36 mol.
The total volume of the solution will be:
= 300 + 300 ml
= 600 ml.
The concentration of the Br ion has been:
Molarity =
Molarity of Br ions =
Molarity of Br ions = 0.6 M.
The concentration of Br ions in the resulting solution of LiBr and RbBr has been 0.6 M.
For more information about the concentration of the sample, refer to the link:
Objectives(s):
In your own words, what is the purpose of this lab?
Hypothesis:
In this section, please include the predictions you developed during your lab activity. These statements reflect your predicted outcomes for the experiment.
Procedure:
The materials and procedures are listed in your virtual lab. You do not need to repeat them here. However, you should note if you experienced any errors or other factors that might affect your outcome. Using your summary questions at the end of your virtual lab activity, please clearly define the dependent and independent variables of the experiment.
Data:
Record the elements present in each unknown astronomical object. Be sure to indicate “yes” or “no” for each element.
Hydrogen Helium Lithium Sodium Carbon Nitrogen
Moon One
Moon Two
Planet One
Planet Two
Conclusion:
Your conclusion will include a summary of the lab results and an interpretation of the results. Please answer all questions in complete sentences using your own words.
Using two to three sentences, summarize what you investigated and observed in this lab.
Astronomers use a wide variety of technology to explore space and the electromagnetic spectrum; why do you believe it is essential to use many types of equipment when studying space?
If carbon was the most common element found in the moons and planets, what element is missing that would make them similar to Earth? Explain why. (Hint: Think about the carbon cycle.)
We know that the electromagnetic spectrum uses wavelengths and frequencies to determine a lot about outer space. How does it help us find out the make-up of stars?
Why might it be useful to determine the elements that a planet or moon is made up of?
Answer:
Uhh..Because as you get farther away then you cant hear the sound waves i think
Explanation:
Answer:
because the sound waves can only travel so far and if there is things near the source the waves bounce off of it. Ex: the speaker in the class room wouldn't be quiet, its like the noise went away as i walked down the halls, maybe the walls were blocking the noise
Explanation:
You would say Scientific knowledge is always being changed and performed in different ways. Scientific knowledge is always being changed as scientist are experiencing and collecting new information everyday using the scientific method.
Scientific knowledge can be changed or modified as scientists use systematic approaches and rigorous methodologies to gather evidence and formulate theories. The scientific method encourages scientists to question existing knowledge, challenge hypotheses, and propose new ideas. Peer review and continuous evaluation help refine scientific knowledge.
Scientific knowledge can indeed be changed or modified. The nature of scientific research is based on the idea of continuous learning and refining our understanding of the world. Scientists use systematic approaches and rigorous methodologies to gather evidence and formulate theories, but these theories are always subject to revision and refinement as new evidence emerges. This is a key aspect of the scientific method, which encourages scientists to question existing knowledge, challenge hypotheses, and propose new ideas.
For example, the theory of evolution has undergone several modifications and updates since it was first proposed by Charles Darwin. As new fossil evidence, genetic studies, and experimental observations have emerged, our understanding of evolutionary processes has evolved and become more nuanced.
In addition, the scientific community engages in peer review, where scientists evaluate and critique each other's work. This process ensures that scientific knowledge is continuously evaluated and refined, and any flaws or limitations in research are identified and addressed.
#SPJ3