Answer:
Explanation:
Answer and Explanation:
Dramatic irony is a technique used by authors in which the audience knows something that the characters do not. In Act 3, Scene 1 of "Romeo and Juliet", Tybalt, who belongs to Juliet's family, wants to duel with Romeo. What Tybalt does not know is that Romeo has married Juliet in secret. Romeo tells Tybalt he will not fight with him because he has reason to love him now - in other words, they are family now. This is the dramatic irony in the scene, for Tybalt does not understand what Romeo means by these words.
The dramatic irony lies in Romeo's newfound kinship with Tybalt through his secret marriage to Juliet, which prompts him to forgive Tybalt's insult and refuse the duel, emphasizing the theme of love and the repercussions of feuds.
The dramatic irony in Act 3, Scene 1 of Romeo and Juliet is that Romeo, recently secretly married to Juliet, now considers Tybalt as his family. However, Tybalt, unaware of this relationship, challenges Romeo to a duel out of family rivalry. Romeo, motivated by his newfound kinship, forgives Tybalt's insult and refuses the challenge, aiming to prevent further bloodshed between their families. This situation emphasizes the recurring theme of love going against traditional expectations and the consequences of long-standing feuds, which is a signature motif in William Shakespeare's tragedies.
#SPJ12
Rewrite the following sentences to correct the dangling phrase? please I need help!!!!!! 1) Sitting at the kitchen table,dinner was served. 2) Creating a load noise, I watched the truck skid on the ice . 3) To write the final exam, a number two pencil must be brought. 4) On the radio it says it is going to rain.
Answer:
Hyperbole
Explanation:
Personification is when you give human characteristics to a non living thing. The cake isn't given human characteristics
Answer:
She cites a series of situations that happened in the country and are happening today, justified by laws, which diminish the ability of social minorities to vote.
Explanation:
The author of the article lists a series of laws that have been established in the states that make it difficult for social minorities, especially blacks, to be able to vote regularly. She says that even after the amendments that allowed black men to vote were passed, states have established other laws that prevent blacks from voting, such as requiring voters to read, for example. These laws were established in an increasingly influential manner, until civil rights were passed in the 1960s.
After civil rights, other laws were created every year that made it difficult for blacks, women, the working class, homosexuals to vote among other members of social minorities. Many of these laws still exist today.
The author argues that modern voting laws that may hinder minorities from practicing their civil rights are supported by evidence from scholarly and legal sources. This includes the impact of voter ID laws and restrictions on voting access, the historical context of disenfranchisement, and the ongoing influence of majoritarianism in policymaking.
The author supports her argument that some modern voting laws might be intended to hinder minorities from exercising their civil rights by citing various forms of evidence. First, she cites the work of Sarina Vij from the American Bar Association's Human Rights magazine which highlights the adverse impact of institutional obstacles such as voter ID laws and decreased access to polling places on minorities. Vij's research indicates that non-White individuals who lack government-issued identification and access to polling stations are more likely to be disadvantaged. Access to information about what is on the ballot and where to vote is often withheld from younger, less educated, and non-White voters, contributing to their further disenfranchisement.
Secondly, the author references a 2020 Harvard University study that lists restrictions on voter registration, early voting, student voting, elimination of same-day registration, and unchecked gerrymandering as factors amplifying voter suppression. These restrictions historically find their roots in the United States Jim Crow laws that fiercely excluded Black voters by using literacy tests, poll taxes, and stringent residency requirements.
Finally, the argument underscores the way majoritarianism continues to shape policy-making, with the majority often finding ways to curtail the political participation of minority groups notwithstanding the ratification of amendments to protect voting rights. The repeal of important aspects of the 1965 Voting Rights Act in 2013 and the introduction of new voter ID laws that disproportionately affect minorities supports this fact.
#SPJ11
b. connotations.
c. denotations.
d. shadings. Mark for review (Will be highlighted on the review page)