The correct answer is “anti-war Democrats”.
The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago was the target of protest by anti-war Democrats.
The Democratic National Convention in Chicago was held on August 26-29, 1968. When the Delegates were in sessions to nominate a candidate for the presidency they were interrupted by thousands of protesters in the streets that were rallying against the Vietnam War. The protested committed violent actions and the Police had to intervene.
The other options of the question were, a) pro-war Republicans, b) pro-war Democrats, and c) anti-war Republicans.
The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago was heavily protested by groups opposing the Vietnam War, most notably the Youth International Party (Yippies) and the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam (MOBE). Intense and violent clashes occurred with the police and the National Guard.
The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago was the target of large-scale protests by several activist groups. The majority of these groups were opposing the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War. The most notable of these protest groups were the Youth International Party, often called Yippies, and the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam, also known as the MOBE. Violent clashes with the police and the National Guard occurred, which led to a significant number of injuries among the demonstrators.
#SPJ6
B.) The paper credited too many sources by renowned historians.
C.) The paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations.
D.) The historian taught history at a prestigious but small university.
E.) The historian regularly maintained personal historical blogs.
The fact that that historian's paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations was surely the factor that led his colleagues to deem the research that he conducted unreliable and, consequently, to reject his work.
As experts and authorities in their respective field, historians must be objective and impartial and they must avoid positioning themselves or letting personal opinions influence their accounts of the past, since, by doing so, they run the risk of distorting the truth. Likewise, when using information from other authors or other sources, it is imperative that they cite them properly, in order to acknowledge them and grant their readers the chance to review them (if they wish to do so). Proper citations are the trademark of a professional, competent and trustworthy historian.
Supreme Court only hears the cases which have worked their way all the way up from local state courts.
Further Explanation:
The Supreme Court of United States is the highest court of the country. It looks after the workings of government in regards to rights provided to people and also keeps an eye of working of lower courts such as Local and State Courts. It never takes up any new case. All the cases that come to Supreme Court for hearing and further verdict come from lower courts. If someone is unsatisfied with the verdict which is given to him/her from lower court then He/She has full right to re-appeal against the verdict in Supreme Court. There is one chief justice and eight associate judges in the Supreme Court. All the judges of Supreme Court are appointed for lifetime. Supreme courts works both under Appellate jurisdiction and Original Jurisdiction. Every year around 10000 cases come to Supreme Court for review but only 80-100 are accepted for reviewing after going through those cases. If Supreme Court chooses to hear a case, both parties are given 30 minutes each to present their case orally and sometimes in some cases, If Supreme Court feels to hear the case more, then this period of oral discussion can also be extended. Earlier the argument of cases used to go on for days and weeks but with the time the workload on Supreme Court has increased and that is the reason there is time limit set for the discussion of a case by Supreme Court.
Learn more:
1.Which issue did the Supreme Court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana? brainly.com/question/8891404
2.In the Supreme Court’s decision in korematsu v. United States, the court said that korematsu? brainly.com/question/8391589
Answer details:
Grade:High School
Subject: Constitution
Chapter:Supreme Court
Keywords:
Supreme Court, Local Court, State Court, Judge, Authority, Case, Verdict, Case Hearing, Lifetime Appointment, Case discussion, Appellate jurisdiction.
They used color and texture to create patterns not found in nature.
B.
They tried to capture scenes with photographic realism.
C.
They broke down common objects and reassembled them in new ways.
D.
They emphasized the changing effects of light on a scene.
B. appointing members of the cabinet
C. delivering a budget to Congress
D. awarding a medal to a war hero
Awarding a medal to a war hero
I took the unit test, this is the correct answer.