The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago was the target of protests by

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The correct answer is “anti-war Democrats”.

The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago was the target of protest by anti-war Democrats.

The Democratic National Convention in Chicago was held on August 26-29, 1968. When the Delegates were in sessions to nominate a candidate for the presidency they were interrupted by thousands of protesters in the streets that were rallying against the Vietnam War. The protested committed violent actions and the Police had to intervene.

The other options of the question were, a) pro-war Republicans, b) pro-war Democrats, and c) anti-war Republicans.  

Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago was heavily protested by groups opposing the Vietnam War, most notably the Youth International Party (Yippies) and the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam (MOBE). Intense and violent clashes occurred with the police and the National Guard.

Explanation:

The 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago was the target of large-scale protests by several activist groups. The majority of these groups were opposing the United States' involvement in the Vietnam War. The most notable of these protest groups were the Youth International Party, often called Yippies, and the National Mobilization Committee to End the War in Vietnam, also known as the MOBE. Violent clashes with the police and the National Guard occurred, which led to a significant number of injuries among the demonstrators.

Learn more about 1968 Democratic National Convention here:

brainly.com/question/32080013

#SPJ6


Related Questions

Which three major factors contributed to the Roman Empire’s decline? political insurrections, military rebellions, famine political instability, military conflict, economic crisis political dictatorship, military genocide, severe drought political stability, military peace, economic growth
Why was Rameses significant in ancient Egypt and provide an explanation of their significance
What did Theodore Roosevelt often see as his greatest accomplishment as President?
What role did the government take in the conflict between unions and management?
Compare the colonization of West Africa to the colonization of Central Africa

The Industrial Revolution has been described as a mixed blessing. Do you agree or disagree? Support your answer with text references

Answers

I would agree because although there was a great increase in the job market and the economy drastically rose, there was very low wages due to mass labor, unsanitary working conditions, and overall poverty.
I'm on the fence because the individual revolution benefited the large companies but on the other hand took many jobs from people.

A historian publishes a paper on the ancient Greek leader Alexander the Great. However, most scholars reject his paper on the basis that the research is not reliable. Which factor could have led to this conclusion?A.) The historian chose a subject that was unpopular among other scholars.
B.) The paper credited too many sources by renowned historians.
C.) The paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations.
D.) The historian taught history at a prestigious but small university.
E.) The historian regularly maintained personal historical blogs.

Answers

Out of all of the answers, the one that makes the most sense would be C. The paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations. 

The fact that that historian's paper showed signs of bias and lacked proper citations was surely the factor that led his colleagues to deem the research that he conducted unreliable and, consequently, to reject his work.  

As experts and authorities in their respective field, historians must be objective and impartial and they must avoid positioning themselves or letting personal opinions influence their accounts of the past, since, by doing so, they run the risk of distorting the truth. Likewise, when using information from other authors or other sources, it is imperative that they cite them properly, in order to acknowledge them and grant their readers the chance to review them (if they wish to do so). Proper citations are the trademark of a professional, competent and trustworthy historian.        

Which statement about the Supreme Court is true? Every case appealed to the Supreme Court is ruled upon by the court. The court hears all cases for which two or more justices agree that the case has merit. The court decides which cases it will hear. In deciding cases, the chief justice’s vote counts as two votes. The court can hear only cases that have worked their way up from local courts.

Answers

The Supreme Court decides which cases it will hear.

The Supreme Court is asked to review more than 7,000 cases each year, so it would not be possible for the court to rule on every case that is sent to it.  The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100 to 150 cases per year.  The vast majority of those cases do work their way up to the Supreme Court from lower courts.  About two-thirds of the cases come from lower federal court decisions that are appealed for review, and about one-third of the cases are reviewing decisions made by supreme courts of individual states.  But there are some cases that can have original jurisdiction at the Supreme Court level -- such as when there is a case between one state government and another or between state governments and the federal government.

Supreme Court only hears the cases which have worked their way all the way up from local state courts.

Further Explanation:

The Supreme Court of United States is the highest court of the country. It looks after the workings of government in regards to rights provided to people and also keeps an eye of working of lower courts such as Local and State Courts. It never takes up any new case. All the cases that come to Supreme Court for hearing and further verdict come from lower courts. If someone is unsatisfied with the verdict which is given to him/her from lower court then He/She has full right to re-appeal against the verdict in Supreme Court. There is one chief justice and eight associate judges in the Supreme Court. All the judges of Supreme Court are appointed for lifetime. Supreme courts works both under Appellate jurisdiction and Original Jurisdiction.  Every year around 10000 cases come to Supreme Court for review but only 80-100 are accepted for reviewing after going through those cases. If Supreme Court chooses to hear a case, both parties are given 30 minutes each to present their case orally and sometimes in some cases, If Supreme Court feels to hear the case more, then this period of oral discussion can also be extended. Earlier the argument of cases used to go on for days and weeks but with the time the workload on Supreme Court has increased and that is the reason there is time limit set for the discussion of a case by Supreme Court.  

Learn more:

1.Which issue did the Supreme Court answer in the case of Duncan v. Louisiana? brainly.com/question/8891404

2.In the Supreme Court’s decision in korematsu v. United States, the court said that korematsu? brainly.com/question/8391589

Answer details:

Grade:High School

Subject: Constitution

Chapter:Supreme Court

Keywords:

Supreme Court, Local Court, State Court, Judge, Authority, Case, Verdict, Case Hearing, Lifetime Appointment, Case discussion, Appellate jurisdiction.

Which characteristic of Impressionist artists can be seen in the example shown here? A.
They used color and texture to create patterns not found in nature.

B.
They tried to capture scenes with photographic realism.

C.
They broke down common objects and reassembled them in new ways.

D.
They emphasized the changing effects of light on a scene.

Answers

They tried to capture scenes with photographic realism and this is the characteristic of Impressionist artists that can be seen in the example shown below. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option or option "B". I hope the answer helps you.

In which situation is the president acting as head of state?A. sending troops into combat


B. appointing members of the cabinet


C. delivering a budget to Congress


D. awarding a medal to a war hero

Answers

Awarding a medal to a war hero

I took the unit test, this is the correct answer.

A. sending troops into combat

Which type of circumstance did President Theodore Roosevelt use to justify U.S. intervention in Latin America?

Answers

Theodore Roosevelt inherited an empire-in-the-making when he assumed office in 1901. After the Spanish-American War in 1898, Spain ceded the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and Guam to the United States. In addition, the United States established a protectorate over Cuba and annexed Hawaii. For the first time in its history, the United States had acquired an overseas empire. As President, Roosevelt wanted to increase the influence and prestige of the United States on the world stage and make the country a global power. He also believed that the exportation of American values and ideals would have an ennobling effect on the world. TR's diplomatic maxim was to "speak softly and carry a big stick," and he maintained that a chief executive must be willing to use force when necessary while practicing the art of persuasion. He therefore sought to assemble a powerful and reliable defense for the United States to avoid conflicts with enemies who might prey on weakness. Roosevelt followed McKinley in ending the relative isolationism that had dominated the country since the mid-1800s, acting aggressively in foreign affairs, often without the support or consent of Congress.