Using an encyclopedia, the Internet, or other resources, research how regional differences and sectionalism added to the problem of slavery. Write an 800-word report explaining how these regional attitudes contributed to America's increasing dispute over slavery. Use proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Whoever will answer this really good, I will give you the brainliest.
Regional differences between the North and South, including economic, cultural, and political disparities, exacerbated sectionalism over slavery. This sectionalism ultimately culminated in the Civil War, triggered by events like the election of Abraham Lincoln and the Dred Scott Decision.
Regional Differences:
The North and South had differing economies, with the North being industrial and the South being agrarian, relying on slavery.
Social and cultural distinctions between the regions influenced their attitudes toward slavery.
Political divisions emerged, with the North supporting a stronger federal government and the South favoring states' rights.
II. Sectionalism:
Various historical events and compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise, Nullification Crisis, Wilmot Proviso, Compromise of 1850, and Kansas-Nebraska Act, exposed and deepened sectional tensions.
The Compromise of 1850, while temporarily reducing tensions, failed to resolve fundamental differences between the regions.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act's introduction of popular sovereignty and the Dred Scott Decision further escalated sectional strife.
The election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and subsequent secession of Southern states marked the climax of sectionalism, leading to the Civil War.
III. Escalation Toward Civil War:
The Dred Scott Decision, which declared enslaved people as property, increased animosity between North and South.
Abraham Lincoln's election as a Republican candidate opposing slavery's expansion led to Southern secession and the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861.
Learn more on the American civil war here brainly.com/question/1020924
#SPJ3
Answer: #1 .....Slavery is any system in which principles of property law are applied to people, allowing individuals to own, buy and sell other individuals, as a de jure form of property. A slave is unable to withdraw unilaterally from such an arrangement and works without remuneration. Many scholars now use the term chattel slavery to refer to this specific sense of legalized, de jure slavery. In a broader sense, however, the word slavery may also refer to any situation in which an individual is de facto forced to work against their own will. Scholars also use the more generic terms such as unfree labour or forced labour to refer to such situations.However, and especially under slavery in broader senses of the word, slaves may have some rights and protections according to laws or customs.
Slavery existed in many cultures, dating back to early human civilizations. A person could become enslaved from the time of their birth, capture, or purchase. Slavery was legal in most societies at some time in the past but is now outlawed in all recognized countries. The last country to officially abolish slavery was Mauritania in 1981. Nevertheless, there are an estimated 40.3 million people worldwide subject to some form of modern slavery. The most common form of modern slave trade is commonly referred to as human trafficking. In other areas, slavery continues through practices such as debt bondage, the most widespread form of slavery today serfdom; domestic servants kept in captivity; certain adoptions in which children are forced to work as slaves; child soldiers; and forced marriage.
Explanation: #2 ...... in the UK.... Sectionalism occurs in the United Kingdom, most notably in the constituent country of Scotland, where various sectionalist/separatist political organisations and parties have existed since the early 1920s, beginning with the Scots National League. Today, Scottish sectionalism is most strongly associated and advocated by the Scottish National Party(SNP), which can be described as both sectionalism and separatist. The SNP advocates for both Scottish independence and more autonomy for Scotland while remaining a part of the United Kingdom.
#3 In the US......Sectionalism in 1800s America refers to the different lifestyles, social structures, customs, and the political values of the North and the South. Regional tensions came to a head during the War of 1812, resulting in the Hartford Convention which manifested Northern dissatisfaction with a foreign trade embargo that affected the industrial North disproportionately, the Three-Fifths Compromise, dilution of Northern power by new states, and a succession of Southern Presidents. Sectionalism increased steadily in 1800–1850 as the North industrialized, urbanized and built prosperous factories, while the deep South concentrated on plantation agriculture based on slave labor, together with subsistence farming for poor whites who owned no slaves. Southerners defended slavery in part by claiming that Northern factory workers toiled under worse conditions and were not cared for by their employers. Defenders of slavery referred to factory workers as the "white slaves of the North".
Meanwhile, Northern industrialists and workers benefited from the slave system, even as some westeners politicians and religious leaders denounced it. The South expanded into rich new lands in the Southwest (from Alabama to Texas). However, slavery declined in the border states and could barely survive in cities and industrial areas (it was fading out in cities such as Baltimore, Louisville and St. Louis), so a South based on slavery was rural and non-industrial. On the other hand, as the demand for cotton grew the price of slaves soared, as slaves were considered imperative for the harvest and refinement of cotton. Historians have debated whether economic differences between the industrial Northeast and the agricultural South helped cause the Civil War. Some historians now disagree with the economic determinism of historian Charles Beard in the 1920s and emphasize that Northern and Southern economies were largely complementary.
Historians do agree that social and cultural institutions were very different in the North and South. In the South, wealthy men owned all of the quality land, leaving poor white farmers with marginal lands of low productivity. Fears of slave revolts and abolitionist propaganda made the South militantly hostile to suspicious ideas. Members and politicians of the newly formed Republican Party were extremely critical of Southern society and argued that the system of free labor in place in the North resulted in much more prosperity. Republicans criticizing the Southern system of slavery would commonly cite the larger population growth of the Northern states, alongside their rapid growth in factories, farms, and schools as evidence of the superiority of a free labor system.
Answer:
still has an impact on American life and government today
Explanation:
DEADLINE= BY TODAY BEFORE 8:00 PM WOULD BE GREAT THANKS LOVES!!!!!
HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!~`
A. Determine the resource's original medium of production.
B. Analyze the author's education and professional background.
C.
Establish how many years separate each resource's publication.
D.
Investigate the main idea of the resource you discover.
Reset
Answer:
I'm not sure , but I would go with D
Explanation:
My educational guess