The case of Dred Scott v. Sandford was a judicial claim, crucial in the history of the United States, resolved by the Supreme Court in 1857, in which it was decided to deprive any inhabitant of African descent, whether slaves or not, the right to citizenship; and the authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories of the country was removed from Congress. The decision was drafted by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney.
On March 6, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney issued the majority opinion. Taney ruled that:
-Anyone of African descent, whether slave or free, was not a citizen of the United States, according to the Constitution.
-The Ordinance of 1787 could not confer neither freedom nor citizenship within the Northwest Territory to non-white individuals.
-The provisions of the Missouri Compromise were annulled as a legislative act, since the act exceeded the powers of Congress, as it tried to exclude slavery and impart liberty and citizenship to non-white people in the north part of the Louisiana territory.
The court ruled that African-Americans had no right to freedom or citizenship. As they were not citizens, they did not have the legal capacity to file a lawsuit in federal court. Because slaves were private property, Congress did not have the power to regulate slavery in the territories and could not revoke the rights of a slave owner according to the place where he lived. This decision nullified the essence of the Missouri Compromise, which divided the territories into free or slave jurisdictions. Speaking on behalf of the majority, Taney ruled that because Scott simply considered himself the private property of his owners, he was subject to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which prohibits taking ownership of his owner "without due process."
B) They could be sent north to work in factories.
C) They could be deported.
D) They could be arrested.
Answer:
Aśoka or Ashoka Vardhana (304-232 BC) was the third emperor of Maury. He was the son of Bindusara and grandson of Chandragupta. He reigned over most of the Indian subcontinent since circa 269 BC. C. to 232 a. From present Afghanistan to Bengal and also to the south, to the present Mysore. Around 260 a. C., conquered Kalinga in a destructive war, something that none of his predecessors had achieved. After witnessing the massacres of war, he gradually became Buddhism. "
Kalinga was a state on the east coast of India, a parliamentary monarchy. Aśoka undertook the war of conquest, eight years after his coronation. The war caused more than 100,000 deaths, and 150,000 deportees. When celebrating his victory, walking through the gardens of Kalinga, he was moved by the number of corpses, and the cries of relatives of the dead.
The deadly war with Kalinga transformed the vengeful Emperor Aśoka into a stable and peaceful patron of Buddhism. Whether or not Buddhism was converted to Buddhism is not clear, despite the Buddhist tradition that affirms it. According to the eminent indologist, AL Basham, the personal religion of Aśoka became Buddhism, at least after the war with Kalingal, but the Dharma propagated by him was not Buddhism. However, his patronage led to the expansion of Buddhism. Buddhism during its mandate in the Maurya Empire, in other kingdoms, and in the whole world towards the 250 a. C.
b. It was leading to a “mobocracy.”
c. It failed to create a functional national government.
d. It lacked a Bill of Rights.
Answer: C. It failed to create a functional national government.
Explanation:
Answer:
hope this helps you
Explanation:
The 14 points included proposals to ensure world peace in the future: open agreements, arms reductions, freedom of the seas, free trade, and self-determination for oppressed minorities.Wilson later suggested that there would be another world war within a generation if the U.S. failed to join the League.
government
B.
religious
C.
tribal
D.
trade
Answer:
A. government
Explanation:
ihuacóatl or Ciuhcóatlen mexica mythology is the soul collector in the same way, is considered the protector of women who died in childbirth. The term was also used in the Aztec society to refer to the head of the armies, said position was the second in importance in the political structure, similar to that of a prime minister.
She was also called Quilaztli, Yaocíhuatl (warrior woman and lover of warriors), Tonantzin (our mother) and Huitzilnicuatec (head of hummingbird). It is related to the tribes of the north. It is described as a mature woman with her face painted half in red and half in black, on her head she wears a crown of eagle feathers, dressed in a red blouse and a white skirt with snails. In the right hand he carries an instrument to weave and in the left hand a shield that matches his crown. According to Aztec mythology, this warrior entity gave victory over its enemies. On the other hand, it is assumed that he was the one who ground the bones that Quetzalcoatl brought from Mictlán to create humanity.