Answer: Force
That is, of course, if you had the multiple-choice as I did,
Explanation:
I took the test and got it correct
hope this helps; sorry it's late
The given statement “Consumer as well as the merchant do pay the charges to the credit card company when transacted for the goods and services bought or sell” is true.
Answer: Option 1
Explanation:
Both the consumer and the merchant pay transaction charges to the company of the credit card for every transaction made in most of the cases.
There are some POS charges of about 2 percent which is to be paid solely by the merchant but they charge to the consumer which is fraudulent. Apart from that, merchant pays 1 to 4 percent of charges as commission charges.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It's a 50/50. I'm probably right
O
A. The government changes its policies on a subject the group cares
about.
O
B. More voters turn out to vote.
O
C. A political party has greater success.
O
D. Voter awareness of important political issues increases.
SUBMIT
"The government changes its policies on a subject the group cares about" result is the most likely outcome of the successful actions of an interest group.
Answer: Option A
Explanation:
Interest groups work via funding members whether through awareness programs or by financial assistance. If they managed to win their favorite representative, the spokesperson would very probably make legislation which would favor interest groups.
The United States has observed a massive increase in the amount of interest groups throughout the past couple of decades, offering an essential pathway for political engagement to individuals. Such groups play a significant role in the development of social and political systems. Intentions for behavior may be focused on positions of financial, social, moral or commercial significance.
The most likely outcome of the successful action of an interest group is (A)
The government changes its policies on a subject the group cares about.
Explanation:
Interest groups can be defined as a group of people who have a common political interest and they also intended to influence the public policies by adopting various methods like electioneering and lobbying.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Because its an national emerginces it could not in less pepole are visting there families to make sure that there ok
Answer:
It is necessary to limit individual rights because the fundamental rights are good but giving extra rights makes a person feel distinguished from the society and establish their supremacy.
In a democracy, the rights that are being written in the constitution of different countries is necessary but on the other hand, granting extra rights to the citizens can destroy democracy and establish a sense of helplessness.
That's it you need to know!
Hope it helps you mate!
Some rights may have to be limited because of the potential adverse impact that the abuse of such rights could have on society at large or on the rights of others: for example, the right to freedom of speech may in many instances legitimately be restricted to prevent harassment of others.
Hope my answer helps you.
:)
Please mark my answer as the BRAINLIEST. Plsssssssssssssssssss
B. A security search at an airport
C. A pat down of a suspect to check for weapons
D. When the driver/owner of a car allows a search of their vehicle
E. The search of a suspicious house
Answer:
It would be E because they need probable cause to search the house.
Explanation:
B would not be correct because to pass the security check you must be searched.
C would be incorrect because officers can Search/Pat anyone down that they have stopped without probable cause.
D is not correct as the owner gives consent
A is incorrect because School Administrators only need reasonable suspicion.