Can Lanza be considered as having displayed the principle of early onset?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: i just took the test the answer is yes
Answer 2
Answer:

Final answer:

Without context, it's hard to definitively state if 'Lanza' displayed the principle of early onset, which refers to psychological issues manifesting early in life. In cases such as Adam Lanza, retrospective analysis suggests potential early-onset mental health issues, but such claim should be made cautiously.

Explanation:

The question asks if Lanza can be considered as having displayed the principle of early onset. This refers to the idea that behavioral or psychological issues manifest early in a person's life, often during childhood or adolescence. Without specific context, it is hard to definitively say whether Lanza displayed this principle. For instance, if we're referring to Adam Lanza, the perpetrator of the Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting, multiple sources suggest he exhibited signs of mental health issues from a young age, which could be taken as an example of early-onset. However, it's important to note that such conclusions should be drawn cautiously, as they are often based on retrospective analysis and not direct clinical assessment.

Learn more about Principle of Early Onset here:

brainly.com/question/32415200

#SPJ2


Related Questions

Which is a benefit of the Rule of Law?Group of answer choicesA. Bureaucratic government procedures are reducedB. Government decisions are based on the will of the majorityC. Government officials can act in their instinctsD. Citizens are protected from random and oppressive uses of government power
2. Which of the following should NOT be included in an emergency kit?A. A blanketB. A portable phone chargerC. A can of gasD. Emergency numbers
I have answered so many questions I could really use a Brainliest
Which of the following is NOT true about public trust?It is the result of ethical decision makingGuarantees there are less criminals in the communityEnsures community members feel safe reaching out to criminal justice agenciesKeeps individuals in criminal justice agencies safe
FIRST RESPONSE GETS BRAINLIEST How did the civil war had to do with “national supremacy”?

In the 1980s, a renewed interest in classical ideas prompted

Answers

Yes they did prompt up indeed in the 1980s

How many years can a person serve as president

Answers

Answer:

The Twenty-Second Amendment says a person can only be elected to be president two times for a total of eight years.

Answer:

A person can only be elected to be president two times for a total of eight years.

Explanation:

U.S. presidents are limited to serving two elected four-year terms in the White House and as many as two years of another president's term. That means the longest any president could serve is 10 years, though no one has been in the White House that long since Congress passed the constitutional amendment on term limits.

What is acceleration depends on the mass and the applied force acting on a object​

Answers

The second law states that the acceleration of an object is dependent upon two variables - the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object. The acceleration of an object depends directly upon the net force acting upon the object, and inversely upon the mass of the object.

An on-duty lifeguard who runs into the ocean to rescue a drowning child, risking his or her own life to do so, has performed a(n) ____________________.

Answers

Answer:

Professional Duty

____ states provide a qualified privilege for letters of recommendation.

Answers

The answer is,

D. Nearly All

What is the difference between total and selective incorperation

Answers

Answer:

The total answer is:  A.

How much of the Bill of Rights applies to the states. Full Incorporation: The theory that the due process clause of Amendment 14 requires states to defend all freedoms in the Bill of Rights; rejected by the supreme court in favor of selective incorporation. Selective Incorporation: The process by which, over time, the Supreme Court applied to states those freedoms that served some fundamental principle of freedom or justice, thus rejecting full incorporation

:)