Explanation: The essential difference is that the democratic government is elected by the citizens, it is mostly an indirect so-called representative democracy. In such a state the government is in the service of the citizens and through the government the will of the citizens is expressed, individualism, the right to freedom and property are emphasised. Citizens in a regular election can change the government, so it is changeable and expresses the will of the people.
In an authoritarian state, the so-called government is subordinate to an authority that governs, abolish democratic rights, elections are conducted, but one knows roughly who will win, such elections serve to say that they are conducted and nothing more. This authority is one ruler with absolute authority, a dictator, and he subordinates all forms of government to himself. So it is a centralised government, usually assisted by a militia or army, and all other institutions that are supposed to work for the good of the people are abolished or have a parade role.
Answer:
is the answer d? i dont really know im just guessing sorry ...
Explanation:
Answer:
This is an example of a mitigating factor.
Explanation:
In criminal law, a mitigating factor is an extenuating circumstance or condition that might lead the jury or judge to lessen a sentence or take into consideration because it explains in greater detail why a defendant might have committed a crime. The factor or circumstance usually makes it more understandable why the defendant took certain actions or why it is possible to have some sympathy or empathy for the defendant. An example would be if the defendant had been manipulated by someone else, for example, or if the crime was committed under duress of some sort, like being mandated to do something by your superiors at work.
"Interchangeable parts" made mass production relatively easy in many industries.
Interchangeable parts will be parts (segments) that are, for useful purposes, indistinguishable. They are made to determinations that guarantee that they are so almost indistinguishable that they will fit into any get together of a similar kind. One such part can uninhibitedly supplant another, with no custom fitting, for example, filing. This compatibility permits simple get together of new gadgets, and less demanding fix of existing gadgets, while limiting both the time and aptitude expected of the individual doing the gathering or fix.
Answer:
The answer is D
Explanation:
hope dis helps