Three students share for sandwiches equally how many sandwiches does each student get

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: 1 and 1/3 each about
Answer 2
Answer: 1.33 4 divided by 3 is 1.33 repeated which I believe is 1 1/3

Related Questions

Which of the following are square roots of the number below? Check all thatapply.100A. 10B. 1001/2C. 5D. -1001/2E. -10E. 50
Karl makes 7 1/2 batches of cookies using 1 1/2 dozen eggs. Suppose Karl onlyhas a dozen eggs. How many batches of cookies could he make?
What is 40/7 as a mixed number
Find the volume.12 m6 m8 m
An element with Mass 630 grams decays by 18.8% per minute. How much of the element is remaining after 7 minutes, to the nearest 10th of a gram?

In parallelogram ABCD, AE and CF are perpendicular to diagonal BD, and EF = 10 cm. If BD = 28 cm, then how long are DE and BF? (Diagram is not drawn to scale.)

Answers

Answer:

Its false.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

False

Step-by-step explanation:

According to the National European World Center, the engineering of the Ford company on Elon Musk's flame throwers proved the globalization of the natural Wallabies and therefore, results in the growth product domestication in almonds.

What is the nth term of this sequence 7, 10, 13, 16, 19

Answers


Well, let's line up the ones we do have, and see if
we can spot the pattern:

n=1 . . . . .  7
n=2 . . . . . 10
n=3 . . . . . 13
n=4 . . . . . 16
n=5 . . . . . 19

Notice that the next term is always 3 more than the one
where you are right now.
That means
                   (the change in the term) / (the change in 'n') = 3

That's the description of the 'slope' of a function.
Whatever the graph of terms vs. 'n' is, its slope is 3 .
The equation is something like  T(n) = 3n .

Something like it, but not exactly.
If T(n) were exactly 3n, then T(1) ... the first term ... would be 3,
and it's not.  It's 7 ... 4 more than that.

Similarly, if T(n) were exactly 3n, then T(2) ... the second term ...
would be 6, and it's not.   It's 10 ... 4 more than that.  Again !

Maybe that's it.  Maybe T(n) = 3n + 4 .
Let's check it out.

If T(n) = 3n + 4, then T(3) ... the third term ... is (9 + 4) = 13.  It is ! !

If T(n) = 3n + 4, then T(4) ... the fourth term ... is (12 + 4) = 16.  It is ! !  

Looking pretty good for that equation.  Try the last one that's given:

If T(n) = 3n + 4, then T(5) ... the fifth term ... is (15 + 4) = 19.  It is ! !

That must be it.  For any number 'n', that term of
the series is

                         T(n) = 3n + 4
 

Final answer:

To find the nth term of the given sequence 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, use the formula: nth term = first term + (n - 1) * common difference.

Explanation:

The given sequence is 7, 10, 13, 16, 19. To find the nth term of this sequence, we first observe that each term is the result of adding 3 to the previous term. So, we can say that the sequence follows a common difference of 3. To find the nth term, we can use the formula: nth term = first term + (n - 1) * common difference.

In this case, the first term is 7 and the common difference is 3. So, the nth term can be found using the formula: nth term = 7 + (n - 1) * 3.

Therefore, the nth term of the sequence 7, 10, 13, 16, 19 is 7 + (n - 1) * 3.

Learn more about nth term of a sequence

brainly.com/question/7882626

#SPJ12

Someone help asap!!!

Answers

Answer:

-25n - 2

Step-by-step explanation:

-2(-5n+6)+5(2-7n)

10n-12+10-35n

Combine like terms

10n-35n-12+10

-25n - 2

As the train’s engineer, Erin guided the train on a 64 mi run, which took 1.7 h. She then stopped on a side rail to let a second train pass. She then continued another 80 mi, which took 1.9 h.What was the train’s average speed for the entire run?

Answers

(144 miles)/(3.6 hours)= 40 (m)/(h)Let's calculate how many miles the train has passed in total:
64+80=144 miles

let's also calculate the complete time: (we can ignore the waiting time here, since they also didn't move during this time:

1.7h+1.9h=3.6 hours.

And now we only need to divide the distance per time:

So the correct answer is 40 miles per hour!

If you put two refraction cups together, what three dimensional shape would you have?

Answers

You would have a cylinder if you put two refraction cups together.

Is 1/2 greater than 1/3

Answers


To find whether 1/2 is greater than 1/3, it is important to convert them to decimals. By converting them to decimals, we can visually understand the number that is greater.
1/2 = 0.5
1/3 = 0.33
So from the above deduction we can conclude that 1/2 is greater than 1/3. I hope the procedure is not that complicated for you to understand. You can always use this procedure for finding the answer to similar kind of questions in future without requiring any help from anyone else.
Obviously 1/2 = 0.5 and 1/3 = 0.33 , so what we need to know is which is bigger , 0.5 or 0.33 ,in this case most would think that 0.33 is bigger than 0.5 because its 5 and 33.
 
Example : if you imaged having apples , wouldn't you want 1 apple out of 2 instead of 1 apple out of 3? yes.We just converted the fractions from 1/2 to 0.5 and 1/3 to 0.33.

Now why would 0.5 also known as 1/2 be greater than 0.33 also known as 1/3, is it because its closer to an whole number? or is 0.33 greater because 33 is simply bigger than 5. Yeah that's what most people think , and that's where they go wrong.

If you look back at the apple example you will have your answer.

 now that you looked back at it this means the answer is yes 1/2 is greater than 1/3