Answer:
carbon dioxide
Explanation:
Running to escape danger is an action that requires the nervous system to coordinate the interaction of the other two body systems which are the muscular and the skeletal systems.
The body system may be defined as the type of system that involves the mutual collection of varying numbers and kinds of organs so arranged that together they can perform complex functions for the body. Examples of body systems may include the endocrine system, cardiovascular system, lymphatic system, digestive system, etc.
According to the context of this question, when an individual wants to run in order to escape from danger. This action is facilitated through the help of numerous body systems.
But the first body system that provokes this action is known as the nervous system. Followed by this, the muscular system and skeletal also came into existence. These body systems are able to migrate the body from the point of danger.
Therefore, running to escape danger is an action that requires the nervous system to coordinate the interaction of the other two body systems which are the muscular and the skeletal systems.
To learn more about Body systems, refer to the link:
#SPJ6
Your question seems incomplete. The most probable complete question is as follows:
Running to escape danger is an action that requires the nervous system to coordinate the interaction of which two body systems?
Drinking and Driving: A Deadly Combination
B. Never Drive with Friends
C. Drink Alcohol, but Just Don't Drive
D.
Never Drive after a Party
Hi :
Which would be the best headline for Najib's article?
A.
Drinking and Driving: A Deadly Combination
You might want to consider looking up your question word for word. I got a good result from Google that you could play off of. This is what it said:
Blood enters the heart through two large veins, the inferior and superior vena cava, emptying oxygen-poor blood from the body into the right atrium of the heart. As the ventricle contracts, blood leaves the heart through the pulmonic valve, into the pulmonary artery and to the lungs where it is oxygenated.
Right now, I'm unable to write something myself, but later if you still need it answered, I'll see what I can do.
Marketing and advertising to children raises ethical concerns from both sides. Proponents argue that it can be educational and promote positive values, while opponents worry about exploitation and manipulation leading to harmful consequences.
Marketing and advertising to children raises ethical concerns from both sides of the argument. On one hand, proponents argue that advertising allows children to become informed consumers and learn about various products and services. It can also create opportunities for companies to promote positive values and educational content. On the other hand, opponents argue that marketing to children can exploit their vulnerability and manipulate their desires, leading to harmful consequences such as excessive materialism and unhealthy habits.
Proponents of marketing to children argue that it can be an educational tool, helping children learn about products, services, and their features. For example, advertising can teach children about different types of food, hygiene products, or educational resources. Moreover, it can promote positive values and encourage children to engage in activities that benefit their development. Advertisements featuring healthy lifestyles, environmental awareness, or social responsibility can have a positive impact on children.
However, opponents of marketing to children raise concerns about potential exploitation and manipulation. They argue that children are more vulnerable to persuasive techniques and may be easily influenced by advertising messages. Marketing that targets children often uses tactics such as animated characters, bright colors, and catchy jingles to capture their attention and create desire. This can lead to materialistic tendencies, unhealthy eating habits, and a focus on satisfying immediate desires rather than long-term well-being.
#SPJ3
Answer:
an ethical argument for would be the emotional response which is normally positive, a child expresses when they see a new toy or game in a store or on tv that they would enjoy. A ethical argument against would be to say it is innapropriate to advertise products to young children who are easily swayed and mislead.
Explanation: