getting rid of euphemisms and clichés.
removing overly complicated language.
coming up with new ideas and topics
Its actually "Coming up with new ideas and topics"
Flowers are as common in London. This sentence was the change to the parallel structure.
According to the sentence was the based on the not that the same grammatical structure. The sentence was the word are the changes in the required of the flexible according to the sentence. The sentence was the faulty parallel structure based. The pattern was the similar to the words.
According to the writer, the parallel structure was the part of the sentence formation. The parallel structure, was the based on the word was the similar to the another word. Flowers are as common in London. Both "flowers" and "people" are common in London. It was the belongs to the similar category.
As a result, the sentence was the change to the parallel structure.
Learn more about on parallel structure, here:
#SPJ2
b. Adverb
c. Noun
d. Pronoun
A. has thrown
B. threw
C. will throw
D. will have thrown
A. Question mark
B. Comma
C. Semicolon
D. Period
The correct answer is Sentence 4 "Paine’s logic is indisputable; without his words, America might have remained subject to British rule to this day".
Explanation:
The word "objective" refers to the quality of text in which the author just reports facts or evidence rather than personal opinions or judgments. In the case of summarizes that are brief accounts of the ideas of another text, a summary is objective when it only includes the ideas of the original text rather than the ideas or opinions of the person writing the summary.
This implies in the case of the text presented that summarizes the ideas of Thomas Paine the sentence that is subjective and needs to be revised to make the summary objective is "Paine’s logic is indisputable; without his words, America might have remained subject to British rule to this day" (Sentence 4) because in this sentence the author of the summary includes his personal perspective but judging Paine's ideas as indisputable and necessary which is not adequate as only the ideas of the ideas of the original text and not the ideas of the author of the summary need to be included for objectivity.