Answer:
The answer is 6
Explanation:
In her first roller coaster she gets a benefit of 10, Then in her second roller coaster she gets a benefit of 6. Thus, her total benefit is 16. Her marginal benefit of the second roller coaster is the total benefit after the second (16) minus the total benefit after the first (10).
Observation:
The statement is not clear about the second roller coaster, in the sense that is not clear if the second gives her a total utility of 6 (reducing the 10 of the first inf 4 units) or this 6 is a marginal utility/benefit. By the way you put it, I assume it is a marginal benefit of 6. If it is not, the correct answer should be -4, and Sue get a negative marginal benefit from her second roller coaster.
Explanation:
The journal entries are shown below:
a. Depreciation expense A/c Dr $4,070
To Accumulated Depreciation - Equipment A/c $4,070
(Being depreciation expense is recorded)
b. Cash A/c Dr $21,900
Accumulated Depreciation - Equipment A/c $40,340
Loss on sale of an equipment $14,540
To Equipment $76,780
(Being sale of equipment is recorded and the remaining balance is debited to the loss on sale of an equipment)
The accumulated depreciation is computed below:
= $36,270 + $4,070
= $40,340
b. assumes that all customers are basically the same
c. ignores markets that are large and spread out
d. focuses on fairly homogeneous market segments
Answer:
Yes, the cost of the annual premium for 10 years was less than the accident claims
Explanation:
Eleanor pays 2,000 dollars per year on premium. In ten-years will pay 20,000 dollars.
The tree caused damage for $ 40,000 thus, more than the premium cost.
It was worthwhile for Eleanor as it paid 20,000 dollar distributed among 10 years for damaged worth $ 40,000
Answer:
a master’s or doctorate degree
Explanation: