Which has a mismatch between subject and modifier? As I was ducking under an awning, the heavy rain caught me without a coat or an umbrella.
Ducking under an awning, the heavy rain caught me without a coat or an umbrella.
Ducking under an awning, I was caught without a coat or an umbrella in the heavy rain.

Answer:

Your answer would be that sentences such as the above are called in--text citations (C).

Explanation:

The sentence above is an example of the APA in-text citation. In-text citations are included when you are adding information from another individual's work into your own project. When you add text word-for-word from another source into your own project or when you paraphrase, you create an in-text citation. Such citations are short and are placed in the body of the text right after the borrowed information. An APA in-text citation includes the following items: the last name(s) of the author(s) (Timmons), the year the source was published (2012), and sometimes the page or location of the information (p. 16).

D) It was his usual custom to wash his hands before each meal.

When one is redundant, one basically says the same thing twice or says something that is unnecessary.  For instance, it would be redundant to say “wet water” because water, by its nature is wet.  Thus, when we look at Option D, the redundancy it contains is “usual custom.”  This is redundant because an act that is customary, or is a custom, is so because of its usual practice.  

Answer:

The answer is explained below.

Explanation:

The Cask of Amontillado is a short story written by American writer Edgar Allan Poe and it is about a revenge planned by Montresor against Fortunato, two characters in the story.

Irony is a rhetorical device that shows an incongruity between expectations for a particular situation and what really happens in the story. In this case, the revenge is an example of irony since Montresor lies to Fortunato so Fortunato follows him to the place Montresor kills him. Montresor tells Fortunato that he wants to show him some wine but he really wanted to kill him.

Final answer:

The Cask of Amontillado by Edgar Allan Poe showcases various forms of irony including dramatic, where the audience knows Montresor's sinister plans; verbal, where Montresor's statements hide his true intent; and situational, where Fortunato's search for a cask of amontillado ends in his untimely death.

Explanation:

The story 'The Cask of Amontillado' by Edgar Allan Poe is replete with examples of irony. Here are a few:

1. Dramatic irony: This is where the audience knows something that the character does not. An example is when Fortunato is unaware of Montresor's sinister intentions, while the readers are aware of Montresor's plans for revenge.
2. Verbal irony: This is where what is said is the opposite of what is meant. An example is when Montresor toasts to Fortunato's 'long life', when he is in fact planning his death.
3. Situational irony: This is where there is a discrepancy between what is expected to happen and what actually happens. An example is when Fortunato follows Montresor into the catacombs in search of the cask of amontillado, only to find his own death instead.

Learn more about Examples of Irony here:

brainly.com/question/10652593

#SPJ6

Of the following, the option that correctly describes the verbal and its function in this sentence is: Barking is a present participle describing the dog.

The presentparticiple is the -ing form of a verb. It is usually used in continuous tenses. The sentence that we are given is in its continuous form because the action is still ongoing.

Bark is a verb. So, its -ing form which is barking is used in the sentence to describe the action performed by the dog.

Therefore, sentence A is correct.

Learn more about present participles here:

brainly.com/question/13637124

i'm afraid the previous answer is incorrect.

so you understand the concept, i will explain why  it is choice A.

present participle: a verb used as an adjective to describe a noun

choice A: barking is an adjective acting as a verb

choice B: a gerund is only used as a noun

choice C:  running is a verb in the sentence, not an adjective

choice D: running in the sentence is not a past participle

:)

Answer (#1):

The word "inescapable" is already a complete word and does not require any affixes. It is derived from the root word "escape" and the prefix "in-," which means "not" or "without." The suffix "-able" is added to the root word to form an adjective that means "not able to be escaped."

To summarize, the word "inescapable" does not have any affixes. It consists of the prefix "in-" and the suffix "-able," which are added to the root word "escape" to create an adjective meaning "not able to be escaped."

Answer (#2):

The word "inescapable" is formed by adding two affixes to the base word "escape."The first affix is the prefix "in-," which means "not" or "opposite of." Adding "in-" to "escape" changes the meaning from "to get away from" to "not able to get away from."The second affix is the suffix "-able," which means "capable of" or "able to." Adding "-able" to "escape" changes the word from a verb to an adjective and means "able to be escaped from."

So, the affixes for the word "inescapable" are "in-" and "-able."

Message:
There are 2 answers to this, please pick the one you think is right! Hope it helped!