Answer:Res gestae statements
Explanation:Res gestae statements are the statements that are concerned with crime related actions ."Res gestae" is the term that is occurrence of the statement just after the crime.
These statements are considered to be accurate and true than the later ones because they are recorded just after the crime. Later statements have the chances of being planned and manipulated .
Answer:
Digital Divide is the correct for this question
b. liquid and solid water
c. extreme temperature variations
d. all of the above
Answer:
The correct answer is That portion of total consumption that is independent of the level of income.
Explanation:
Autonomous consumption refers to the goods and/or services that a person needs to purchase, even when he has no disposable income. This expenditure is independent of the level of income because, even if a person has no income at all, he still needs to pay for certain goods to survive, such as food or health services.
Answer:
here are all of the answers to this quick check although I got a 3/5 I can see the answers for it
Explanation:
1.An investor sells a bond on the secondary market below the price she paid for it.
2. stock market.
3.A low interest rate encourages people to borrow because interest rates are paid to savers by borrowers, so a low interest rate means a low opportunity cost for borrowing. This IS generally confused for the other option like this SAVING anyways.
4. Autonomous consumption is the amount that a person must spend on basic needs (such as food and housing) regardless of his or her income. I had a tough time with this because others have honors econ and I don't.
5. $40,000 I got this one confused because the LOAN was the principal of loan not the $15,000 interest raise. hope this helps :)
Answer: The scientific method provides a systematic approach for testing hypotheses, even when it is not possible to use several different groups. In such cases, scientists can make use of other experimental techniques to evaluate their hypotheses. Here are a few possible methods:
1. Controlled experiments with repeated measurements: The scientist can design an experiment where a single group is exposed to different conditions or treatments. The measurements or observations are then repeated multiple times to ensure reliability. By comparing the results from the different conditions or treatments, the scientist can analyze the data and draw conclusions about the hypothesis.
2. Comparative studies: Instead of having multiple groups, the scientist can compare different variables or factors within a single group. For example, if the hypothesis is about the effect of temperature on plant growth, the scientist can expose the same group of plants to different temperature levels and measure their growth over time. By comparing the growth of the plants under different temperature conditions, the scientist can evaluate the hypothesis.
3. Observational studies: In situations where experimental manipulation is not feasible, scientists can conduct observational studies. They can collect data by observing natural phenomena or existing conditions. For example, if the hypothesis is about the impact of air pollution on respiratory health, the scientist can analyze existing data from areas with different levels of air pollution and compare the rates of respiratory illnesses.
4. Simulation or modeling: When conducting experiments is not practical or ethical, scientists can use computer simulations or mathematical models to test their hypotheses. They can input data and parameters into the simulation or model and observe the predicted outcomes. This allows them to assess the validity of their hypothesis in a virtual environment.
Remember, the specific method chosen will depend on the nature of the hypothesis and the available resources. Scientists must carefully design their experiments, collect and analyze data, and draw conclusions based on the evidence obtained.