Public education
Public transportation
Sweatt v. Painter (1950) represented the NAACP’s attempt to focus on segregation in Public education. Thus, option 'B' is the correct option.
The Supreme Court found that Sweatt had to be admitted to the University of Texas School of Law under the equal protection clause in states where there were public graduate and professional schools for white students alone, but not for black students. Because it opened up graduate and professional programs to black candidates, the case directly impacted the University of Texas.
Black students, meanwhile, were only able to seek degrees at segregated black institutions like Prairie View A&M University and Texas State University for Negroes, which is now Texas Southern University. Black undergrads were not accepted because the University of Texas applied a restrictive reading of Sweatt.
Learn more about Sweatt v painter here:
#SPJ6
Answer:
B: public education
Explanation:
edge
Answer:
the federal government decided in 1917 to conscript young men for overseas military service. Voluntary recruitment was failing to maintain troop numbers, and Prime Minister Sir Robert Borden believed in the military value, and potential postwar influence, of a strong Canadian contribution to the war.
Explanation:
I HOPE THIS IS HELPFUL FOR YOU AND OTHERS
FOLLOW ME
PLZ MARK ME AS A BRAINLIEST
Answer:
However, upon his return from London on May 1917, Borden met with his cabinet and announced that he would be imposing conscription. ... He was convinced that Canada's war effort was weak and only conscription could make it respectable. All of his English-speaking ministers supported the idea.
Explanation:
hope it helps
As a result of Brown v. Board of Education's ruling, racial segregation came to be considered a violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This ruling opened the way for racial integration and achieving civil rights for African Americans.