What were some of the rights violated during Japanese Interment (United States)?

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: Over the course of Japanese-American internment, a number of constitutional rights were violated by the United States government. While these abuses were never freely admitted by the United States, or the Supreme Court, on further analysis we can conclude that the rights to the freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assemble, and many others were violated ("Summary").

Religious rights at Japanese-American internment camps were one of the first victims of the human rights abuses. At the internment camps, the practice of the Shinto religion was outright outlawed, and Buddhism was severely restricted by the ban on Japanese written materials, which was necessary for worship ("Summary"). Overall, the practice of any Eastern religion was highly discouraged, and banned in the case of Shintoism. Denying these Japanese-Americans their right to worship the religion that their ancestors had done for thousands of years was a downright human rights disgrace.

At the same time, the first Amendment to the United States Constitution was again violated, as Japanese-Americans were denied the guarantee of free speech while interned at the camps ("Summary"). Japanese-Americans were not allowed to speak Japanese while at public meetings, and public newspapers were not allowed to be printed in Japanese ("Summary"). In violation of the American right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances, there are many documented cases of Japanese-Americans being labeled as "troublemakers", and sent to isolation camps, who attempted to petition the government for redress ("Summary").

Violating the fourth amendment to the United States Constitution, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), prior to Japanese-American internment, had systematically searched the houses of Japanese-Americans without search warrants, seeking any item whose origin was Japanese ("Summary"). In essence, the FBI was basing its searches of the houses of over 100,000 people on the basis of their national origin, and no evidence of disloyalty to the United States whatsoever. This was an obvious and blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and a violation of the rights of Japanese-Americans. Simple and everyday items as common as short-wave radios that can be found in most American households were confiscated from Japanese-Americans ("Summary").

Perhaps the among the most grievous, the forced removal and subsequent detention of Japanese Americans resulted in the denial of witnesses in their favor, and the denial of assistance of counsel for their defense ("Summary"). Also, almost none of the 100,000 interned Japanese-Americans were given a speedy trial or access to any legal representative whatsoever upon accusations of their disloyalty to the United States ("Summary"). Finally, almost none of the Japanese-Americans were told of the crime that they had committed against the United States, as most of them had committed none ("Summary"). The 5th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was grievously violated, and Japanese-American rights were vehemently denied.

The "assembly centers" and "detention camps" that Japanese-Americans lived in during their internment were grossly inadequate for their conditions, and completely insufficient to what they deserved ("Summary"). The hospitals in the internment camps were understaffed, medical care poor and food was dietetically deficient ("Summary"). Each of these circumstances can qualify as cruel and unusual punishments for the Japanese-Americans, a violation of the 8th Amendment. A large number of the Japanese-Americans interned were citizens of the United States. As citizens of the United States of voting age, it was their constitutional right under the 15th amendment to vote regardless of their race, color, or previous condition of servitude ("The Bill"). However, in the case of Japanese-American internment, the right to vote in public elections was denied, as the Japanese-Americans were prohibited from returning home to vote at their place of residence ("Summary"). Finally, in violation of Constitutional Amendment XIV, the equal protection of Japanese-Americans was violated because the government acted “solely on the basis of race and national ancestry” when identifying persons to be excluded from designated “military areas” along the West Coast states ("Summary'). The Japanese-Americans were deprived of their liberty when they were forcefully taken from their homes and placed in internment camps full of armed guards, weaponry, and hostile soldiers.

Related Questions

Why were enslaved Africans brought to the Americas?
What role did the tigris and euphrates rivers play in the development civilizationA) they enriched the soil and helped farmers grow supplies surpluses.B) they enabled the people of mesopotamia to become sea traders.C) they provided enough water for farmers not to have to irrgate their crops.D) they isolated the people of mesopotamia from other religions.
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prevents individual states from denying citizens the rights of life, liberty, and which of the selections listed below?A. propertyB. the pursuit of happinessC. legalityD. the right to an attorney
How did Juan perón gain power in Argentina?
Formed by Americans in Sonoma, California

This landmark hosted the delegation that created the founding documents of the United States. It is considered by many to be the birthplace of our republic. What is its correct name and location?Independence Hall in Philadelphia, PA
U.S. Capitol Building in Philadelphia, PA
U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, D.C.
Independence Hall in Washington, D.C.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This landmark is where the U.S. Constitution is interpreted and disagreements about it settled. Which of the following is the correct name and location of this landmark?

Supreme Court Building and Washington, D.C.
U.S. Capitol Building and Philadelphia
Supreme Court Building and Philadelphia
U.S. Capitol Building and Washington, D.C.

Answers

Good Morning!

The place that is considered of birth of the American republic is the Independence Hall, located in Philadelphia, in the State of Pennsylvania. It was there that, in 1776, the Independence of the United States of America was declared. The laws of the United States and the interpretation of the Constitution is done by the Supreme Court, in its building located in the capital, Washington, D.C.

Hugs!

Answer:

The place that is considered of birth of the American republic is the Independence Hall, located in Philadelphia, in the State of Pennsylvania.

How did the discover in oil change texas

Answers

Answer:

The Spindletop discovery changed everything on January 10, 1901, when oil was struck. ... Spindletop is an oil field built on top of a salt dome located near Beaumont, Texas which mainly produced lumber. On that history-making day, the Spindletop gusher raged for 9 days gushing 100,000 barrels of oil per day.

During the 1840s Americans used the idea of manifest destiny to justify the what?1. Expansion of women's rights
2. Aquairing of new territory
3. Beginning of free public education
4. Repeal of Missouri compromise
And also what is manifest destiny?

Answers

2 - was the idea that americans (not the europeans) were made to civilize the American territory (south part). That ideia was created by God, i mean, the destiny of america was chosen by god.

Answer: 2. Acquiring of new territory.

Explanation: Both government and individual felt nothing should stop the all-powerful drive to expand the size of the country.

Haw many years ago was 300BC

Answers

300 BC means 300 years before the birth of Christ.

To know how many years ago is 300 BC, you need to add 300 to the number of years that have elapsed after 1 AD (this is because there is no year zero).

Based on this:
300 BC was (2017-1) + 300 = 2016 + 300 = 2316 years ago.

It was 2316 years ago.

Miep brings a cake to the annex. What can we infer about how each person is dealing with the stress of living in the annex by how they act that morning?

Answers

Answer:There was not peace in 1943 and 1944 is not starting with peace.

Explanation:

What did the Missouri compromise, the compromise of 1850, and bleeding Kansas have in common

Answers

This is so cool! I'm learning about this right now too :)

Answer:

The Missouri Compromise and the Compromise of 1850 both had to do with states that wanted to enter the U.S. California wanted to enter the Union which apparently had upset the balance of free and slave heavy states. The Kansas- Nebraska act involved violence between pro and anti slavery supporters.

hope this helps!

Final answer:

The Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and Bleeding Kansas all share a common theme - they were attempts to resolve conflicts over the issue of slavery in America. They highlight the balance of power between free and slave states and the concept of popular sovereignty, which caused strife and sparked violent confrontations.

Explanation:

The Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and Bleeding Kansas all highlight America's struggle with the issue of slavery. Fundamental to all three events was the conflict and tension between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces, particularly as new territories were incorporated into the Union. Balancing the power between free and slave states was a key concern.

The Missouri Compromise in 1820 brought in Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, maintaining a balance in the Senate, and drew a line south of Missouri where slavery was subsequently prohibited. Decades later, the Compromise of 1850 dealt with the territories won from the Mexican-American War, applying the principle of popular sovereignty to decide slavery status, causing further sectional divide. Lastly, Bleeding Kansas was the scene of bloody confrontations as pro- and anti-slavery forces clashed violently over the territory's status.

All three events thus share themes of sectional conflict over slavery, attempts at political compromise, and the failure of these compromises to permanently resolve the issue.

Learn more about Sectional Conflict Over Slavery here:

brainly.com/question/29480238

#SPJ12

Other Questions

Whats was the first president of ireland

How did Adolf Hitler explain the problems facing Germany in his book Mein Kampf?

How was tubman treated as a slave ?

Which statement best completes the diagram related to the U.S public schools in the late 1700s and early 1800's