Why would rural people have more trouble accepting the one child policy than the city policy

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The rural people had more issues accepting the one Child policy due to the fact that they had farms so they needed a big population for the farm work.

What was the one child policy?

This was a policu that is targeted at the rising population of the country. What the policy is aimed at is to control the population.

In this way, the resources in the nation would not deplete fast. The rural sides needed more [people to help with work.

Read more on child policy here: brainly.com/question/1277504

#SPJ2

Answer 2
Answer: rural people had farms and thus needed more workers so they just had a bunch of kids to help out. if the city they didn't need a bunch of kids.

Related Questions

The treatment of Americans of Japanese descent during World War II is similar to which of the following? the experiences of Hispanic Americans in wartime industries during World War I Irish Americans' experiences living on the home front during World War I the experiences of German Americans during World War I African Americans' experiences on the battlefield during World War I
The poems and plays of which person are representative of the English Renaissance
An anthropologist studies _____.
What is a group of people settled in a particular area who carries the same interests
President Kennedy was relatively unsuccessful in passing civil rights legislation during his time in office because __________.a. congressional Democrats were split into conservative and liberal factionsb. Kennedy felt that states should have primary jurisdiction over civil rights issuesc. the Republican Party controlled Congressd. the demands of the civil rights movement had not yet become known to most Americans

The political ideas of Ho Chi Minh, Fidel Castro, and Pol Pot were strongly influenced by the writings of

Answers

I did some research this may not be right but it might be North Vietnam's leader at the time.

The United States hotly protested Stalin's actions in Poland, East Germany, and the rest of Eastern Europe as a violation of the "one world" principle of the Atlantic Charter and a departure from the agreements reached at Yalta and Potsdam. Aside from pushing for creation of the United Nations, did American policy actually abide by its own principles, or was it just as much based on national self-interest as the Soviet Union's?

Answers

The United States were just as much based on national self-interest as was the Soviet Union. The thing with the United states was that they were seen as the good guys because they were democratic and capitalist, while the Soviet Union was seen as the bd guys because they were communist and a socialist state. 
The correct answer for the question that is being presented above is this one: "Basically, Stalin himself is not part or not one of the signatories to the Atlantic Charter. At that time is the foundation document for NATO, which is an anti-Soviet alliance. USSR occupied many nations for the reason of protection of the borders and creation of buffer zone. For Germany, it is an assurance that Russia won't be able to invade Russia."

Which idea was not part of Karl Marx's philosophy as seen in Das Kapital or the Communist Manifesto? A. If leaders followed the rules of Christianity, they would be better rulers. B. Business owners have never been fair to their workers. C. Capitalism is a bad economic system. D. Workers are the real producers of wealth.

Answers

The ANSWER is : If leaders followed the rules of Christianity, they would be better rulers.( Trust me I just got this question right on my test :)

Answer:

The answer is A. If leaders followed the rules of Christianity, they would be better rulers

Explanation:

I took the test and mastered all the questions it was EZ

What challenge did President Bush face in August of 2005?

Answers

In the August of 2005, President Bush's largest challenge was dealing with the aftermath of the Hurricane Katrina. He also had issues within the Iraqi war as well as with some other external affairs.
In August 2005, President Bush's most considerable challenge was to deal with the natural disaster of Hurricane Katrina.
On August 29, 2005, a hurricane named Katrina struck Louisiana and the Gulf coast. President Bush placed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) on high alert. Relief supplies were distributed while the military prepared for the emergency. The federal efforts were meant to help state and local officials in their relief efforts. President Bush further signed an emergency declaration allowing Louisiana to use federal resources to pay for the states disaster response preparations.

Why did the
Egyptians first fall
to the lydses and
then drive them on?

Answers

Answer:

New International Version

He jammed the wheels of their chariots so that they had difficulty driving. And the Egyptians said, "Let's get away from the Israelites! The LORD is fighting for them against Egypt."

New Living Translation

He twisted their chariot wheels, making their chariots difficult to drive. “Let’s get out of here—away from these Israelites!” the Egyptians shouted. “The LORD is fighting for them against Egypt!”

English Standard Version

clogging their chariot wheels so that they drove heavily. And the Egyptians said, “Let us flee from before Israel, for the LORD fights for them against the Egyptians.”

He caused their chariot wheels to wobble, so that they had difficulty driving. “Let us flee from the Israelites,” said the Egyptians, “for the LORD is fighting for them against Egypt!”

He caused their chariot wheels to swerve, and He made them drive with difficulty; so the Egyptians said, "Let us flee from Israel, for the LORD is fighting for them against the Egyptians."

And He took off their chariot wheels, so that they drove them with difficulty; and the Egyptians said, “Let us flee from the face of Israel, for the LORD fights for them against the Egyptians.”

Recently there has been major controversy overremoving Confederate (Southern) monuments in the United States. Using your knowledge about the Confederacy and the

causes of the Civil War, why might this inscription be

considered "controversial" by a number of Americans?

Answers

Answer:

Explanation

Explanation:

It has been noted that over seven southern states in the US have passed laws to makes it difficult for people to remove statues considered to be confederate monuments. Protesters and public officials have made different attempts to remove these public objects that have been perceived to be symbols of Racism in the United States of America.

The issue is an aftermath of the civil war that happened in the United State in 1861 after several decades of tensions that happened between the southern and northern states over the rights of states, slavery and the westward expansion.  

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

You forgot to include the inscription to know what you are referring to.

However, doing some research we can comment on the following.

If the inscription refers to the Anderson Division of Hills Corps of the Florida Infantry, then our comment would be the following.

this inscription be

This inscription might be considered "controversial" by a number of Americans because it only refers to the 1st Florida Infantry Regiment that was formed by the Confederate state of Florida in times of the Civil War. Along with the 3rd Regiment, they fought in Tennesse as part of the battles fought in the American Civil War.

The inscription does not consider the black soldiers of the Union Army that were also killed in the battle site, so that is why people, in this tumultuous times of change, consider the inscription controversial.