Relationships among privet individuals or companies are governed by?

Answers

Answer 1

Answer: Relationships among private individual or companies are governed by
civil law.

Answer 2

Answer: Relationships among privet individuals or companies are governed by? CIVIL LAW

Related Questions

(MC)Which of the following did the United States gain as a result of its possession of the Panama Canal Zone? an inexpensive labor market a major ship-building facility an important source of revenue a military presence in Latin America
Berlin Airlift, 1948 Which sentence best completes this diagram?Stalin cut off supply lines to democratic West Berlin.Stalin allowed free access to West Berlin by railroad and air.Stalin united all the Allied sector of Berlin under one city government.Stalin had a wall built in Berlin to separate East and West Berliners.
Bragging is a sign of positive self-concept.
American soldiers often quarreled with each other and refused to take orders. A. True B. False
I know this is really easy but my head hurts and I can’t understand nothing atm can someone please help me

In a criminal trial, when do the lawyers explain what they intend to prove?

Answers

Answer:

A during jury selection
B during jury deliberation
C during closing statements
D during opening statements

Answer:

during open stamements

Explanation:

During the prosperous 1990s, the sales of very expensive cars, SUVs, and limousines increased tremendously. What is the economic explanation for this trend ?

Answers

Inflation because inflation causes costs of goods and services to rise(which is a good thing). This is usually in a time of prosperity

What does immoral mean to you

Answers

Immoral means not moral and connotes evil or licentious behavior. Amoral, nonmoral, and unmoral, virtually synonymous although the first is by far the most common form, mean utterly lacking in morals (either good or bad), neither moral nor immoral.

What was New Harmony, Indiana?a successful factory town
a community of escaped enslaved persons
a model utopian community
a community for religious dissident

Answers

New Harmony, Indiana is a model utopian community.

New Harmony is the site of not just one, but two early American utopian communities. The Harmony Society, led by George Rapp, arrived in the United States in 1804 and settled in Pennsylvania before purchasing 20,000 acres on the Wabash River and moving to Indiana in 1814. Established by the Harmony Society in 1814 under the leadership of George Rapp, the town was originally known as Harmony (also called Harmonie, or New Harmony). In its early years, the 20,000-acre (8,100 ha) settlement was the home of Lutherans who had separated from the official church in the Duchy of Württemberg and immigrated to the United States. The Harmonists built a new town in the wilderness, but in 1824 they decided to sell their property and return to Pennsylvania. Robert Owen, a Welsh industrialist, and social reformer purchased the town in 1825 with the intention of creating a new utopian community and renamed it, New Harmony. The Owenite social experiment failed two years after it began.

Learn more about American society here: brainly.com/question/13323062

#SPJ4

Answer:

c. a model utopian community

Explanation:

Which statement about the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education decision is not correct?A.
Brown v. Board of Education overturned the earlier Plessy v. Ferguson ruling.

B.
The court declared that "separate but equal" public education was unconstitutional.

C.
The court ruled that individual states could decide whether to integrate public schools.

D.
The nine justices were unanimous in handing down their decision.

Answers

"C. The court ruled that individual states could decide whether to integrate public schools" is incorrect. The decision meant that all states had to abide by the ruling.

Answer: The correct answer is c.

Explanation:

If the Vietnam War was a bar fight how would it be?

Answers

You'd have the two people, the United States and Vietnam, fighting obviously however it's important on the US side that you have a guy tweeting or doing something to tell everyone how good the fight is going for the United States no matter how bad it actually is going. Eventually it would look like the U.S. was doing respectable and then the guy representing the Vietnamese would almost destroy the U.S. guy (i.e. the Tet offensive) the United States guy would try his best to comeback but eventually his friend would start sending pictures to people rather than just words and people would realize that the U.S. guy didn't stand a chance and things were looking bad. At this time the U.S. guy would slowly back away and get his friend (a guy representing the South Vietnam people) to start fighting the guy until the South guy alone is fighting the other Vietnamese guy.
This is the way I would picture it thought this is a very simplified way that it would go down.

Other Questions

What roles did England and Spain play in religious conflicts?

Socrates said that “A system of morality which is based on relative emotional values is a mere illusion, a thoroughly vulgar conception which has nothing sound in it and nothing true.” How would you apply the meaning of this phrase to today’s moral standards?

Which of the following words means the policy or action by which one nation controls another country or territory1: Communism2: nationalism3: industrialism4: imperialism

What was the state religion of China begun by the Han Dynasty?A. Buddhism B. Confucianism C. Shinto D. Islam