B. wanted to keep trade in China open.
C. had no interest in trade with China.
D. broke China into distinct spheres of influence.
Can someone explain this one for me ?
2Japan adopted Chinese customs outright, but Korea adopted customs to fit its needs.
3Japan invited collaboration with China, while Korea was conquered by China.
4Japan adapted Chinese customs to fit their needs, while Korea adopted the customs outright.
Answer: Japan invited collaboration with China, while Korea was conquered by China.
Explanation:
Japan, China, and Korea had a long history of frequent conflict.
However, the Chinese-Japanese friendly contact started through trade, and eventually, the Chinese influence over Japan grew because the Japanese imperials adopted many Chinese customs. Very different is the case of Korea, which was conquered by China before having their influence spread on their customs.
Japan invited collaboration with China, while Korea was conquered by China.
Answer:
federal agencies
Explanation:
hope this helps
The NAACP is a civil rights organization which was found in 1909 with the purpose of advancing justice for all African Americans.
The UNIA is a fraternal movement founded by Jamaican Marcus Garvey under the purpose of the advancement of all people of African descendant around the world.
With time, UNIA lost influence, as their leader, Marcus Garvey, was deported from the United States in 1927. On the other hand, the NAACP evolved as an organization who worked for the advancement of not only people of African descent but also other minority groups, as well as women.
your own writing as you answer the following questions.
What is the credibility of the source?
The U.S. Civil War started due to complex issues beyond just slavery, including economic differences, states' rights, and political power. Post-war, the Southern states were not 'taken over' by the North, but were re-integrated into the Union.
While the student's assertion correctly identifies slavery as a significant factor in the conflict between the North and South, it's important to clarify that the U.S. Civil War was not solely about slavery. It's more accurate to say it was about differing economic systems, political power, states' rights, and yes, the institution of slavery. The modern industrialized North advocated for a strong central government and wanted to stop the spread of slavery to new states, which would give slave states more political power. In contrast, the agrarian South believed in states' rights and the survival of its slave-based economy. This growing divide led to the secession of southern states and thus began the Civil War.
Upon the defeat of the Confederacy by the Union (North), the South became part of the United States again, and the institution of slavery was abolished. It is incorrect to say that the North 'took over' the South's lands. The Southern states were restored to the Union, and although they underwent a period of reconstruction, they remained separate states with their local governments.
#SPJ12