Answer:
Option: A- Germany had to surrender Poland, Belgium, and Denmark.
D- Germany had to limit the size of its military forces.
Explanation:
Treaty of Versailles was signed to end World War I in 1919. Under this treaty, German was humiliated and not called in the negotiation before signing the treaty. The treaty imposed on Germany with terms and conditions. The German military capabilities harshly restricted with minimum arms and ammunition and no airships. Germans were forced to pay off very large reparations to the allies. The treaty also required the surrender of territory which had been part of Germany before the war.
Answer:
I think it doubled tell me if I am right or not.
Explanation:
"The arms build-up was a more important underlying cause than the network of alliances." This statement presents an argument that building more arms is more important than building your alliances. It shows a personal preparation and independence form other alliances. It is believed that they can face the battle on their own.
i try^$^
B. Isocrates
C. Gerocesia
D. Pericles
Answer:
1. Replace the stop signs at intersections with traffic signals. 2. Replace the stop signs at intersections with roundabouts.
Explanation:
To begin I havent saw the content of your currciulum so I do not know if this is something you may have learned
* LANE=ROAD/STREET or what ever you like to call it*
Option One: Replace Intersections all together with round-a-bouts or aka the circular intersection. Round-abouts are far more safer and forgiving, when you go into the intersection you dont have to comit to the move, thus eliminating one of the main reasons people make accidents at intersections: accidently going into an intersection, realizing their mistake, and out of panic crash into other cars trying to get out. As an added bonus round a bouts do not require traffic lights are far mor visually apealing. Furthermore, rounfd abouts eliminate the confusion of traffic lights something that also causes accidents at itersections.
Option two: In America at an intersection, the system works by lanes taking turns of which lane has cars moving into them. This alows for cars to move into lanes with other cars in their blind spot a huge contributor to accidents. A solution to this is changing how the system works. Instead of lanes taking to turns to allow cars to flow into their lane, the lane takes turns letting cars out of their lane. As a result only one lane has cars moving out of it making it much safer by eliminating the blind spot dillema and making the actual lane/road change in the intersection itselft less crowded and safer as a result. However, this sacrifices the speed at the intersection making the process slightly slower.
Nowadays, we know, thanks to science, that the human memory is very unreliable. When it comes to details specially, scientists found out that eyewitness remember so little of what is actually true and fill in the blanks with false details generated by the brain. This all when the witness is asked about what happened moments after the event.
Considering this knowledge, even though Douglas's account might be correct, it is very unlikely to be the case when it was written 22 years later.
So the answer is no, I do not trust his account.
One of the greatest British empiricists, Locke claimed that knowledge came from experience, both from external sources, in sensations, and from internal sources, through reflections.
He explained that before we perceive anything, the mind is like a blank sheet of paper, but once we start to perceive everything around it, "simple sensory ideas" arise.
These sensations are worked on by thought, knowledge, belief and doubt, resulting in what Locke called "reflection". The mind is not a mere passive receiver. It classifies and processes all sensations as it forms our knowledge and personality.
Locke defended intellectual freedom and tolerance. It was a precursor to many liberal ideas, which only flourished during the French Enlightenment in the 17th century. Locke criticized the theory of divine right of kings, formulated by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes.
For Locke, sovereignty does not lie in the state, but in the population. He claimed that, to ensure a rule of law, the representatives of the people had to enact the laws and the king or the government to enforce them.
He was the first to present the principle of the division of the three powers, according to which the power of the state is divided between different institutions.
The Legislative Power, or Parliament, the Judiciary Power, or the Court, and the Executive Power, or the Government.