Answer:
C Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor
Explanation:
The Answer is "Profits from the arms sold to Iran were used to fund the Contras in Nicaragua." just took the test
control of Central Asia.
land and resources.
industrial power.
During the 19th century, almost from 1830 onwards, two great empires butted heads with each other in a diplomatic and political confrontation over the control of central Asia and especially the access that the lands of this region provided to India, which was part of the British Empire. The two empires fighting were Britain and Russia. Both were looking for these lands and each were doubtful about the control the other had on the regions, especially in Asia and Europe. This led to a situation known as the Great Game, which ended in a military confrontation in 1838. Although part of the reason of the confrontation was the desire for control of Central Asia, the main reason for this was the desire of both empires to outdo the other in the control of the land and resources that were offered by the countries of the region. The correct answer here then is C: land and resources.
Answer:
land and resources.
Explanation:
edg 2020
collaboration between nations to prevent tyranny
hope this helped
B. A historian who shares a diary entry from a Chinese woman who lost her crops to drought
C. A historian who offers evidence that Christians were targeted during the Boxer Rebellion
D. A historian who shows that harvest yields declined in the years before the Boxer Rebellion
The best answer is A historian who claims the Boxer Rebellion followed directly from the actions of external colonial powers.
In order to understand this question, let us investigate what counterclaim means. It means a claim made to invalidate a previous claim. In this context, our answer needs to have, in its context a structure that goes against what the first historian said.
A historian who claims the Boxer Rebellion followed directly from the actions of external colonial powers - True - By giving a total antagonist cause for the rebellion, a cause that sustains itself with no connection to the previous argument, this case qualifies as a counterclaim for the first historian.
B. A historian who shares a diary entry from a Chinese woman who lost her crops to drought - False - This argument contributes to the original argument, showing a case that supports the historian.
C. A historian who offers evidence that Christians were targeted during the Boxer Rebellion - False - This claim only indicates the possible targets of the Boxer Rebellion, knowing the first claim is about the reason for the rebellion, it does not qualify as a counterclaim.
D. A historian who shows that harvest yields declined in the years before the Boxer Rebellion - False - This argument reinforces the first historian argument, showing one possible cause for the massive drought and famine in China.