Answer: Gain of $600,000
Explanation: As we know that :-
Gain / loss = Sales value - Cost of building
Now, we can compute cost of building on date of sale as follows :-
cost = purchase date cost - accumulated depreciation
= $850,000 - $ 200,000
= $650,000
putting the values into initial equation we get :-
Gain = $1,250,000 - $650,000
= $600,000
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "A": the five forces framework.
Explanation:
Porter's Five (5) Forces is an analysis scheme created by American economist Michael E. Porter (born in 1947). The ultimate goal of this analysis is to help managers set their expectations of profitability because as competition increases, profitability decreases. Three of the five forces relate to those involved in the industry. The other two apply to the suppliers, the vertical participants, and consumers.
2. increases with higher interest rates
3. increases with longer periods of time
4. decreases with longer periods of time
Answer:
C. 2 and 3
Explanation:
Note: Options to the question are as follows "A. 1 and 3, B. 1 and 4, C. 2 and 3, D. 2 and 4.
FV = PV(1 + r)^t
Future value of a dollar is the value of a dollar if it earns a certain interest fro a specified time. Future value increases with an increase in interest rates and time. Conversely, it decreases with a decrease in interest rates and time.
Thus, Option c is correct.
Answer:
a. The statement is false because a policy motivated by good intentions may have unintended negative consequences.
d. The statement is false because sound economic reasoning is required to anticipate unintended consequences of policies that are motivated by good intentions.
Explanation:
It is important to have good intentions when creating policies but a sound policy requires more than just good intentions.
To create a sound policy, sound economic principles and reasoning must be employed. This is important to predict and tackle unintended negative consequences that may arise, irrespective of how good the intentions were in creating the policies.
Merely having good intentions does not guarantee sound policy, particularly in economics. Sound economic reasoning is needed to anticipate possible consequences. Thus, the claim that good intentions lead to sound policy in economics is not entirely accurate.
The statement 'The economic way of thinking stresses that good intentions lead to sound policy' is not entirely valid. Merely having good intentions is not enough to ensure a sound policy, especially in an economic context. Economic reasoning is needed to ascertain the possible implications, both positive and negative, of a policy. As such, the elements a. and d. of the given options are correct:
#SPJ6
Answer:
Debit Cash account $15,120
Credit Unearned Service Revenue $15,120
Being entries to record cash collected for service to be rendered.
Debit Unearned Service revenue $1,890
Credit Service Revenue $1,890
Being entries to recognize revenue earned as at 31 December
Explanation:
When an amount is collected in advance for a service yet to be rendered, the company recognizes and asset in form of cash and a liability in form of Unearned Service Revenue.
When the service for which cash was collected is performed, revenue is said to have been earned. Entries required then are debit Unearned Service Revenue Credit Service revenue.
For Mesa, on 1 July , entries required are
Debit Cash account $15,120
Credit Unearned Service Revenue $15,120
Being entries to record cash collected for service to be rendered.
As at 31 December, revenue earned
= 1/2 × $15120/4
= $1890
Entries required
Debit Unearned Service revenue $1,890
Credit Service Revenue $1,890
Being entries to recognize revenue earned as at 31 December
The journal entries and adjusting entries should be shown below.
Cash account $15,120
Unearned Service Revenue $15,120
(Being entries to recordcash collected for service to be rendered)
Unearned Service revenue $1,890 ( 1/2 × $15120/4)
Service Revenue $1,890
( to recognizerevenue earned as at 31 December)
These journal entries should be recorded.
learn more about journal entries here: brainly.com/question/24741269
Answer:
Direct Material Price Variance = (Actual price - standard price) x actual quantity purchased
Direct Material Price Variance = ($0.80 - $0.83) x 11400000 = $342000 (F)
Actual Price = $9120000 / 11400000 = $0.80
Direct Material Quantity Variance = (Actual quantity - standard quantity) x Standard Price
Direct Material Quantity Variance = (11400000 - 12480000) x $0.83 = $896400 (F)
Standard Quantity = 1040000 x 12 = 12480000
The direct materials price variance is $342,000 unfavorable and the direct materials quantity variance is $9,351,200 favorable.
To calculate Parker Plastic's direct materials price variance, we need to compare the standard price per unit of direct materials with the actual price per unit. The formula for calculating the price variance is (Actual Price - Standard Price) * Actual Quantity.
Using the given information, the actual price per unit is $0.80 per sq. ft, so the price variance is ($0.80 - $0.83) * 11,400,000 sq. ft = $342,000 U.
To calculate the direct materials quantity variance, we need to compare the standard quantity per unit of direct materials with the actual usage. The formula for calculating the quantity variance is (Actual Quantity - Standard Quantity) * Standard Price.
Using the given information, the actual usage is 11,400,000 sq. ft, so the quantity variance is (11,400,000 - 1,040,000) * $0.83 = $9,351,200 F.
#SPJ3
Answer:
The correct answer is $588,000.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the computation of the given data are as follows:
We can calculate the cash receipts for Quarter 4 by using following formula:
Cash receipts for Quarter 4 = Cash Sales + Cash collected from credit sales in Qtr 4 + Accounts receivable of Qtr 3
Where, Cash sales = $580,000 × 50% = $290,000
Cash collected from credit sales in Qtr 4 = ($580,000 × 50%) ×60% = $174,000
Accounts receivable of Qtr 3 = ($620,000 × 50%) × 40% = $124,000
By putting the value, we get
Cash receipts = $290,000+$174,000+$124,000
= $588,000