The correct answer to the question presented is that non-smokers live 13.2 years more compared to people who smoked. According to the research data results from the state of Missouri, smokers are prone to have shorter lives compared to those who do not smoke.
Answer:
13.2
Explanation:
Does not take into account where your weight comes from (fat vs. muscle)
Very cost efficient
Only for use with Adults
7.02
Height- weight charts are used to calculate thebody mass indexof the person to see how healthy they are. Being cost-efficient is not a negative aspect of the height weight chart. Thus, option C is correct.
A height weight chart is used to measure the growth factors like the height and weight of the person to compare it with the regular parameters to determine the body condition.
It does not provide information about the fat and muscle content and percentage in the body and is a negative aspect. The method being cost-effective is not negative but rather positive as it can be easily used by everyone.
Therefore, the cost efficiency of the chart is not a negative aspect.
Learn more about height-weight charts here:
#SPJ2
b. folic acid
c. niacin
d. riboflavin
Your Answer would be B. Folic Acid
Relaying signals from a neuron to other cells is a function of the **synapse**.
The synapse is a specialized junction or connection point where a neuron communicates with another neuron or a target cell, such as a muscle cell or another neuron. At the synapse, neurotransmitters are released from the axon terminal of one neuron and received by receptors on the membrane of the adjacent cell, allowing the transmission of signals from one cell to another. This process is fundamental for neural communication and the transmission of information throughout the nervous system.
To know more about neuron :
#SPJ12
Answer:
Axon terminals
Explanation:
The control you have over these factors are high. Whatever we put on the plate and our life-style is basically our responsability. However, it is true also that a person who has financial struggles has less control over its choice than a person who can afford good meals, gym and other actvities. So, there is a degree of personal responsability but we should also remember that we live in a society with inequality, so those should count as well.
---
As I said before, there is a certain degree of responsability, but first of all we should be sure that people know these things. After that, we should make affordable having an healthy diet (and as long coke could cost less than water this is not going to happen soon) and than, only when all people, regardless of their native condition, could have access to healthy eating and activities, than we can talk about personal responsability. Until then, I can only consider responsable the people who have the means to prevent such things and do nothing.
a. True
b. False
Answer:
TRUE
Explanation: