In what way did the u.s. government expand the rights of people with disabilities in the 1960s and 1970s?

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: The United States' government expanded the right of people with disabilities in the 1960s and 1970s when the Congress passed the laws guaranteeing all the citizens of the United States with disabilities to have an education.

Related Questions

Which does not describe chinas great leap forward?a military alliance with the soviet union an attempt to increase industrial productivity a program designes to modernize the country a 15 year plan
What term describes the distribution of control between a central government and smaller units of government?
#DidNotStudy People living in the United States' outlying areas can usually do everything except:A.use the U.S. postal serviceB.travel freely in the United StatesC.vote fully in Congress and for the PresidentD.elect their governor
In Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1960), the Supreme Court ruled the ___________ gerrymanders were not constitutional.
What inference can be made about King John to explain why the writers of the Magna Carta included this passage?

What was New Harmony, Indiana?

Answers

New Harmony, Indiana is located in wabash river in harmony township, it lies 15 miles north of mount Vermont
“DescriptionNew Harmony is a historic town on the Wabash River in Harmony Township, Posey County, Indiana. It lies 15 miles north of Mount Vernon, the county seat, and is part of the Evansville metropolitan area. The town's population was 789 at the 2010 census.”

Did president roosevelt oppose any efffort to build a canal across panama

Answers

No, President Roosevelt did not oppose any effort to build a canal across panama, since he and most other Americans during this time knew that the construction of the canal would be economically advantageous. 

Who are the men who are shown in the fun for the boys cartoon

Answers

The "Fun for the Boys" cartoon by William Bengough published on August 23rd, 1900 shows William H. Taft, Theodore Roosevelt, and William McKinley. In this anti-imperialism cartoon, these men are revising the declaration of independence and editing it. There's a ghost watching them as they do so and that is George Washington, who looks as very deep in thought.

W. Bengough is clearly against the US for acquiring the Philippines after Spain lost a war to the United States. The Philippines were outraged as they were seeking independence.

The men shown in the "Fun for the boys" political cartoon are:
William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, and William Howard Taft.

Hope this helps. 

What was one challenge the U.S. military faced in recruiting men to serve in the armed forces? (5 points) feelings of lack of support from the American public getting white soldiers to fight alongside African American soldiers providing enough soldiers to fight in both Europe and the Pacific the reluctance of Mexican Americans and Native Americans to enlist

Answers

The correct answer here would be the third option. The problemUS military faced in the WWII was finding enough man to be able to compete onboth fronts, those fronts, being in Europe and in the Pacific. The troops neededto be sent to Europe in order to engage the Nazi Germany directly while on theother side of the globe the US had to fight Japan in the Pacific and send notonly troops but weapons and vehicles also. 

Answer:

C. Providing enough soilders to fight in both Europe and the Pacific

Explanation:

I took the test! Hope this helps

According to the Supreme Court, which of these is most likely prompted the arrest of the protesters in Edwards v. South Carolina? A. The protesters supported an unpopular view
B. The protesters assembled in front of the Statehouse
C. Protesters were a threat to public safety
D. The protesters marched without a permit

Answers

Answer

The protesters supported an unpopular view.

Explanation

According to the First Amendment in the civil rights movement, the Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina had violated students’ rights of peaceable assembly, speech, and petition when the police dispersed a peaceful protest against segregation..This was when a certain group of the  African-American high school and college students marched on the South Carolina State House grounds in Columbia to protest segregation SO  the Supreme Court ruled that South Carolina had violated students' thus according to the Edwards v he protesters supported an unpopular view.

The correct option is \boxed{\text{A. The protesters supported an unpopular view}}.

Edward V. Carolina case was the situation which was interfered by the Supreme court who had supported the amendments in the Articles from First to Fourteenth and prevented the administration state administrators to reinforce the petitioners which were meeting lawfully to the anterior side of the statehouse.

Further Explanation:

Supreme court imprisoned, executed, and sentenced applicants who have violated the free power of applicants independence of petition and free association. The Highest authority of Courts also maintained the privileges are guarded by fourteenth amendments and confirmed by the first amendment of the United States. Edwards v. South Carolina was a matter in which the Supreme Court sustained that state government administrators are not permitted to assault the mob to disband if they are unless constitutionally walking in front of a statehouse. The judgment was based on the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the US Constitution. The Supreme Court explained that the suspensions were an effort to make illegal the nonviolent appearance of offensive views, and therefore a violation of the marchers’ right of free expression, free association, and independence to appeal for restoration of grievances.  The highest authority of tribunal interpreted the detentions and condemnations of 187 protesters was an effort by South Carolina to make unlawful and the favorable appearance of unpopular views where the marcher's efforts were an application of First Amendment freedoms in their most fundamental and classic method. The Court explained the common law violation of breach of the sympathy as not susceptible of specific definition.

Learn more:

1. In the case roe v. wade, the supreme court ruled that state laws? brainly.com/question/10483664

2.  In Mcculloch v. Maryland, what did the state of maryland argue?  brainly.com/question/1373726

Answer Details:

Grade: High School

Subject: History

Chapter: Supreme Court Cases

Keywords:

Protestors , supreme court , Edward , South Carolina , amendment , freedom , restoration ,  grievances, violation , judgement , government , suspension, unpopular.

After the war, Ottoman lands were divided into

Answers

Mandates,

Hope this helped :)

Answer:

Mandates

Explanation: