b. Chinese Civil War
c. Soviet loss in Afghanistan
d. North Korean loss in South Korea
c. Soviet loss in Afghanistan
Answer: Secretary of State
Further context/detail:
The office of Secretary of State is the USA's cabinet-level official in charge of foreign relations and foreign policy. In other countries, a similar position would be called "Minister of Foreign Affairs."
John Foster Dulles was Secretary of State under President Eisenhower. He held the office from 1953 to 1959. He wanted a change from what had been the "containment policy" which the US had followed during the Truman Administration, as recommended then by American diplomat George F. Kennan. Dulles felt the containment approach put the United States in a weak position, because it only was reactive, trying to contain communist aggression when it occurred.
Dulles sought to push America's policy in a more active direction; some have labeled his approach "brinksmanship." In an article in LIFE magazine in 1956, Dulles said, "The ability to get to the verge without getting into the war is the necessary art." He wasn't afraid to threaten massive retaliation against communist enemy countries as a way of intimidating them.
A) rule by a mob.
Hope This Help ^_^
Answer:
itz A through C on edge the first user is wrong
Explanation:
have a bless day
hope this helps
B)They believed it would create an autocratic federal government.
C)They believed it was a bundle of compromises.
D)They believed it would propel the nation into anarchy.
E) They believed it was weaker than the Articles of Confederation.
Antifederalists opposed the new Constitution because they feared it would create a powerful federal government that could oppress the rights of states and individuals.
The Antifederalists were a group of individuals who opposed the ratification of the new United States Constitution primarily because they feared it would lead to the creation of a powerful and potentially autocratic federal government. Particularly, option B) They believed it would create an autocratic federal government is the most appropriate. They believed that this system of government would oppress the rights of individual states and citizens. Furthermore, compared to the Articles of Confederation, which provided more power to individual states, they deemed the Constitution to be stronger and thus, riskier.
The Antifederalists opposed the new Constitution for several reasons. Firstly, they believed that it favored the more populous states, giving them too much power. Secondly, they feared that the new Constitution would create an autocratic federal government, with too much power concentrated in the hands of a few. Lastly, they believed that the new Constitution was weaker than the Articles of Confederation, which had provided greater protection for individual states' rights.
#SPJ6
Answer:
I think it's C they gave women new power
Explanation:
A salon is a gathering of people under the roof of an inspiring host, held partly to amuse one another and partly to refine the taste and increase the knowledge of the participants through conversation. So option C doesn't make sense.
Salons were social gatherings of intellectuals in 17th and 18th century France, focused on promoting intellectual discourse, culture, and arts. They shaped significant social trends and political philosophies but were not used for pursuing commercial or business transactions.
In history, particularly in the 17th and 18th century France, salons were gatherings of intellectuals - philosophers, writers, artists, and other dignitaries. The primary aim of these gatherings was to enlighten the participants through conversations, and to refine their taste through exposure to arts and philosophy. It was also a platform for educated discourse on political philosophies and social trends, giving rise to several pivotal ideas that shaped Europe's Enlightenment period.
However, salons were certainly not a place for commercial activities. Their purpose was more about fostering intellectual discourse, promoting art and culture, and setting social trends, rather than pursuing any kind of business or commercial venture. Therefore, an argument can be made that salons were important for all of the reasons – sharing ideas about arts and philosophy, setting social trends, providing a platform for educated discourse – except for enabling commercial activities.
#SPJ6