The Constitution of the United States of America, written well over 200 years ago, has been the foundation for building one of the great nations. It is the central instrument of American government and the supreme law of the land. For more than 200 years, it has guided the evolution of U.S. governmental institutions and has provided the basis for political stability, individual freedom, economic growth and social progress.
However, the birth of the Constitution is not accidental, but has complicated economic and political backgrounds. The period after the Revolutionary War was characterized by economic depression and political crisis on the grounds that the Articles of Confederation just devised a loose association among the states, and set up a central government with very limited powers. The central government could not get the dominant position in the country’s political life while the individual states could do things in their own ways. In this chaotic situation, the central government was incapable of paying its debt, of regulating foreign and domestic commerce, of maintaining a steady value of the currency, and worst of all, incapable of keeping a strong military force to protect the country’s interests from foreign violations. As time went by, the old system became more and more adverse to the development of the young nation, and political reform seemed to be inevitable. The best solution was to draw up a new constitution in place of the Articles of Confederation.
The Constitution was drawn up by 55 delegates of twelve states (all but Rhode Island) to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787 and ratified by the states in 1788. That distinguished gathering at Philadelphia’s Independence Hall brought together nearly all of the nation’s most prominent men, including George Washington, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and Benjamin Franklin. Many were experienced in colonial and state government and others had records of service in the army and in the courts. As Thomas Jefferson wrote John Adams when he heard who had been appointed: “It is really an assembly of demigods.”
Despite the consensus among the framers on the objectives of the Constitution, the controversy over the means by which those objectives could be achieved was lively. However, most of the issues were settled by the framers’ efforts and compromises, thus the finished Constitution has been referred to as a “bundle of compromises”. It was only through give-and-take that a successful conclusion was achieved. Such efforts and compromises in the Constitutional Convention of 1787 produced the most enduring written Constitution ever created by humankinds. The men who were at Philadelphia that hot summer hammered out a document defining distinct powers for the Congress of the United States, the president, and the federal courts. This division of authority is known as a system of checks and balances, and it ensures that none of the branches of government can dominate the others. The Constitution also establishes and limits the authority of the Federal Government over the states and emphasizes that power of the states will serve as a check on the power of the national government.
Answer:
A. It provided jobs for thousands, but it did not end unemployment.
Explanation:
The New Deal's main goal was to take the country out of the Great Depression and put it back on the road to prosperity. During the New Deal period, in fact, the American economy strengthened and grew, but domestic problems (such as poverty and inequality) continued. Critics claim that it was actually World War II that reared the national economy, pulling industrial production and development.
Critics point out that there has been a growth in the public deficit and in informal work. There was immense government interference in the economy, especially in small businesses and, according to them, a growth of state socialism, to the detriment of the capitalist financial system, which had made the United States a power.
Many historians, analysts and supporters of the New Deal say it has saved the US economy by pulling the country out of the recession generated by the 1929 Crisis. They say that new government regulations have helped businesses, especially small businesses, increase financial system justice . There has also been a reduction in income inequality. Assistance to the poor, the unemployed and the expansion of social security (especially for the elderly) was also well accepted by the population
concepts pertaining to the roman catholic church :) thanks
B. Create parallelism by showing the opposing argument side-by-side
C. To create a simile by comparing arguments to each other
D. To build paid those by showing he feels bad for his opponents
The correct argument is A;
To build ethos by showing he understands the other side.
By showing that he understood the opposing argument, Thomas Paine demonstrated his great understanding of America under British rule. This allowed him to gain credibility, since he is well-versed and knowledgeable in many areas, not just when it comes to supporting his own argument.
Thomas Paine highlighted the opposing view of the colonies prospering under British rule to build ethos and strengthen his argument in his pamphlet 'Common Sense'. Therefore, option A is correct.
Thomas Paine, in his persuasive pamphlet 'Common Sense,' brings up the opposing argument that the colonies have prospered under British control with intention: He aims to build ethos by demonstrating his comprehensive understanding of the other side's viewpoint.
It's a rhetoric strategy often applied in persuasive writing; by acknowledging and then refuting an opposing viewpoint, the writer not only demonstrates a thorough understanding of the issue at hand, but also strengthens their own argument and credibility.
#SPJ11
(This is so late ;-;)
True
Hope that helps
-May