Explain the argument that led to the three-fifths rule and the consequences of that rule.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

The three-fifths rule was a rule that was created to solve the problem of representation in the US Congress. With this rule, slaves were considered 3/5 of a person for purposes of representation and direct taxation.

The main arguments that led to this rule was that Southern slaveholders wanted slaves to count for the purposes of representation, because then the Southern states would be considered more populated and it would cause a bigger representation of their interests in Congress. But Northern states feared that this would give southerners too much power.

The main consequence of that rule was that with it Southern States held the balance of political power.


Related Questions

How did the southern colonies differ from the middle and new england colonies?
HELP ASAP!!8. How did Franklin Roosevelt attempt to restore trust in the banking system? A. He pushed billions of dollars of government money into buying the banks.B. He declared a bank holiday and developed a ranking system for banks.C. He let the free market sort out strong and weak banks.D. He declared a bank holiday and then kept most banks closed.
What is one reason that people in the Middle Ages started marrying younger?
The congress of ___ united workers from all industries. A. American FederationB. Social Security C. Labor Relations D. Industrial Organizations
Which of the following helps explain why conflict between American Indians and colonists worsened over the 17th century? American Indians refused to recognize the treaties and land sales made through earlier leaders. American Indians grew more proficient with guns through hunting and came to depend on them. The colonists mistakenly believed that the American Indians had kidnapped their family members. The colonists began attacking and closing down the praying towns and any missionary centers.

Popular sovereignty was used in attempt to?

a. ease pro-slavery and anti-slavery tensions
b. strengthen the power of the federal
government
c. uphold the Missouri Compromise
d. divide the Union

Answers

Answer:

a. ease pro-slavery and anti-slavery tensions.

Explanation:

How does geography  affect history

Answers

geography can affect history by acting as an advantage or disadvantage in wars, it could be rich in land for helping a city/country prosper and the way the people communicated on the terrains. that was one of the reasons why Rome was unconquerable. Rome was built between 7 hills that provided a distinct advantage in defenses
Well it affects their culture

Which one of the following was true of French relations with Native Americans? The French appropriated significant amounts of land for fur trading. The French were proud that they were considered tougher on Indians than their English and Spanish counterparts. The French sent nuns to try to Christianize the natives, because they understood that gender relations were different among Native Americans than they were among whites. Native Americans resented that the French had no need for their help in the fur trade. Jesuit missionaries tried to convert Native Americans, but gave them far more independence than did Spanish missionaries.

Answers

the answer is Jesuit missionaries tried to convert Native Americans, but gave them far more independence than did Spanish missionaries.

Answer:

the answer is Jesuit missionaries tried to convert Native Americans, but gave them far more independence than did Spanish missionaries.

Explanation:

i know it is right

Which one of the following is considered important to create a 'virtuous cycle' by theparents?

Answers

Answer:

D

Explanation:

UESTION 6 Which of the following is a primary source of historical evidence? a book written in 1992 by a journalist born in 1965 about the Mexico City Olympics in 1968 a poem about the first modern Olympic Games held in Athens in 1896, written in 2000 by an American poet who has a graduate degree in history a tape-recorded interview conducted in 1987 with a famous sport historian about the ancient Greek Olympic Games in the 5th century B.C. a newspaper article about the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics written at the time the Games were in progress

Answers

A tape-recorded interview from 1987 with a sport historian about ancient Greek Olympic Games in the 5th century B.C. is a primary source of historical evidence. So, the correct choice is option C.

A primary source of historical evidence is a tape-recorded interview conducted in 1987 with a famous sport historian about the ancient Greek Olympic Games in the 5th century B.C. Primary sources are original materials or eyewitness accounts created at the time of the event or shortly after. In this case, the interview with a sport historian provides firsthand knowledge and expert insights about the ancient Greek Olympic Games.

It offers direct information from a credible source with expertise in the subject matter, making it a valuable primary source for historians and researchers studying ancient Olympic history. The other options involve secondary sources, interpretations, or creations based on historical events, rather than direct, firsthand accounts or records from the time of the events. Therefore, option C is the suitable choice.

For more questions on Historical Evidence

brainly.com/question/37747385

#SPJ3

Answer:...

Explanation:

The principle of checks and balances limits government power by:A. making sure that laws apply to leaders and common citizens.
ООО
O B. requiring citizens to vote to approve all laws passed by Congress.
C. preventing the government from taking certain freedoms away
from citizens.
O D. giving each branch of government some power over the others.

Answers

Answer:

D. giving each branch of government some power over the others.

Explanation:

Each branch being able to check the power of other branches stops one form of government from taking to much power and pulling rights from the people.

Answer:

D

Explanation: