Answer:
i will work on this give me a minute
Explanation:
The debate over renaming monuments and parks like Nathan Bedford Forrest State Park relates to historical memory and education. The decision depends on how we view the purpose of such public spaces, whether they are to honor the named individuals or serve as reminders of history.
The issue of renaming historical monuments and parks that are currently named after individuals with a racist past, such as the Nathan Bedford Forrest State Park in Tennessee, resides in the broader context of historical memory and education. Major General Nathan Bedford Forrest, under whom Southern forces executed African American Union defenders rather than taking them prisoner, is a contentious figure.
Those who argue for preservation of these names emphasize the necessity to remember all aspects of history, even those that are uncomfortable, as to ensure that we learn from past mistakes. However, opponents suggest the renaming or removal of these landmarks as a means of no longer commemorating figures that instigated and upheld racial discrimination. They argue it's part of a necessary process of social reconciliation and change that acknowledges the wrongdoing of these individuals.
Ultimately, it comes down to a question of the primary function of public memorials and sites. If the purpose is viewed as honouring the person, it would be hard to justify maintaining the name of someone with a racist history. If, instead, it is seen as a means of historical education, then it could be argued that renaming or removal could erase a vital teaching tool about a regrettable part of our past.
#SPJ3
B. the code of hammurabi
C. the epic of gilgamesh
D. ziggurat
The egyptions learned about making bronze tools and using chariots from the?
A. hykos
B. summerians
C. sea people
D. retricerians
B) It forced colonists who had so far remained neutral to pick a side and enlist in the war.
C) It helped the Continental Army remove all British barracks from New Jersey.
D) It helped secure France’s military and financial aid for the American cause.
E) It was the colonists’ first victory against the British during the Revolution.
It made the British realize they were fighting a lost cause and soon after, they conceded the war.
Further Explanation:-
Battle of Yorktown is considered the last battle of the revolutionary war. This war came to close on October 19, 1781, in the Yorktown district of Virginia. This battle proved to be a decisive factor which was a combined effort from the American Continental troop which was lead by General of that time, ‘George Washington’ and French army troops against British army whose commander in chief during that time was General Charles Cornwallis. This siege by troops was considered as last major battle of Revolutionary American war after the surrender of Charles Cornwallis, The British had to negotiate and surrender in order to end the conflict. Five days after this siege got over, the British navy arrived to rescue the British army. Admiral Thomas Graves who was in charge of this fleet was informed about the surrender of General Charles Cornwallis and many soldiers from the British troop confirmed this fact to Admiral Thomas. The Washington moved its army to New York and they remained in New York till the time the Treaty of Paris was signed, which eventually ended the war formally in the year 1783. America’s victory at Yorktown among the most significant battles of the American Revolution because It made the British realize they were fighting a lost cause and soon after, they conceded the war.
Learn more:
1. How did Europe's desire for an ocean route to Asia shape its contacts with Africa?
2. Why did Gorbachev choose the united nations as his forum for this speech?
Answer details:
Grade – High School
Subject – History
Chapter – Battle of Yorktown
Keywords – United States, France, Britain, Yorktown, Battle, Treaty of Paris, New York, Washington, Troops, Army, Navy Fleet.
Answer:
yes yes they came to the United States for freedom and Independence and they are met with even stricter rules and unfair situations
Whether complaints give people reason to go to war and possibly die depends on the severity of the complaints, historical, cultural context, and the socio-political environment. Wars usually occur when there's a perceived threat to a nation's sovereignty or way of life, with stakeholders weighing these against the cost of war. However, war decisions are generally made by governments, not individuals.
Whether complaints give people reason to go to war and possibly die varies greatly depending on the seriousness of these complaints, cultural, historical context, and the socio-political environment. It's essential to understand that wars generally happen when there's a perceived threat to a nation's sovereignty, economy, or way of life. For instance, the American Revolution was initiated because of complaints about British rule, including taxation without representation and encroachment on American liberties. These were seen as significant enough issues to go to war over.
However, the decision to go to war involves numerous factors and isn't taken lightly given the enormous costs in terms of lives, resources, and potential political fallout. The stakeholders often weigh the severity of the complaints against these costs before deciding on armed conflict.
Furthermore, a war decision is generally made by the state or government, not individuals. Thus, personal views on complaints may not translate directly into collective behavior.
#SPJ3