Answer:
whats the right answer?
Explanation:
afford new machinery
use many pesticides
grow traditional crops
?????????
maybe i think it is-afford new machinery
Answer: Workforce analytics
Explanation:
From the given details, we can state that Albright Corp tends to engage in the practice of Workforce analytics. Workforce analytics is regarded as the approach under which one measures the behaviors of individuals such as employees, candidates and thus analyze them in order to improve business performance. This is usually done by analyzing individuals data using methods mostly statistical and software.
Answer:C. making product decisions
Explanation:
Decisions regarding the product,
includes what promotional method one is going to use for their product , what prices are they going to charge , and what channels are they going to use in order to distribute their product. These are all the steps that are necessary to do right in order to ensure that the marketing of that product brings success to the owner.
Brett for example is undecided on the choice of publishing because it can either make or break her sales.
B) would be allowable under no circumstances.
C) only the United States President could sanction it
D) should only occur during an official war.
Answer:
The correct answer is A. In Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the Supreme Court ruled that trial by military commission for the detainees went against the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Conventions and could only be allowed if Congress authorized it.
Explanation:
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld was a lawsuit before the United States Supreme Court filed by Salim Hamdan, the bodyguard and driver of Osama bin Laden who has been held without charge on Guantanamo Bay since 2001, against Donald Rumsfeld, United States Secretary of Defense, under President George W. Bush.
On 29 June 2006, the court ruled by a 5 to 3 majority that the special military tribunals set up by the Bush administration for the Guantanamo Bay prisoners without Congress authorization were not allowed under the provisions of US military law (Uniform Code of Military Justice) and international law (Geneva Convention).
Hamdan was assisted by Charles D. Swift, lawyer for the US Navy, and Neal Katyal, professor of law at Emory University School of Law.
The Third Amendment to the United States Constitution states:
"No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
This amendment was included in the Bill of Rights to address a specific grievance of the American colonists against British authorities during the colonial period and the early years of the United States. It places limitations on the government's ability to quarter or house soldiers in private residences and protects the property rights and privacy of citizens.
Key provisions of the Third Amendment:
Prohibition of Quartering in Peacetime: The amendment explicitly states that during times of peace, soldiers cannot be quartered in any private house without the consent of the homeowner. This provision ensures that citizens' homes are free from military intrusion during peaceful periods.
Restrictions During Wartime: In times of war, if the government deems it necessary to quarter soldiers in private homes, it must do so in a manner "prescribed by law." This means that any such quartering must be authorized by specific legislation or legal procedures rather than being left to the discretion of military authorities.
In practice, the Third Amendment is rarely invoked in contemporary times because the United States has well-established military bases and facilities to accommodate its armed forces. However, it remains an important safeguard of individual property rights and privacy, reflecting the historical concerns of the framers of the Constitution regarding the abuse of military power.