Answer:
The got equal rights like being able to work the normal jobs men work as well as not having to stay at home mothers
They wrote about Roman conquests that happened after the Roman Republic declined.
They wrote about the tetrarchy form of government that was used during the Roman Empire.
They wrote about the development of Stoicism during the Roman Empire.
Summary:
Explanation:
The 1832 case, Worcester v. Georgia, ruled unconstitutional a Georgia law requiring non-Native Americans requiring a license from the state to be on Native American land. In responding to the case, the Supreme Court asserted that the federal government is the sole authority to deal with a Native American nation. From this Supreme Court assertion came the beginnings of tribal sovereignty within the United States for Native American nations -- that the US government would deal with them as domestic nations inside the United States.
The court case was named after Samuel Worcester, a Christian minister working among the Cherokee who was supportive of the Cherokee cause. To block the activity of a man like Rev. Worcester, the state of Georgia passed a law prohibiting white persons to live within the Cherokee Nation territory without permission from the Georgia state government. Worcester and other missionaries challenged this law, and the case rose to the level of a Supreme Court decision. The decision by the Supreme Court, written by Chief Justice Marshall, struck down the Georgia law and reprimanded Georgia for interfering in the affairs of the Cherokee Nation. Marshall wrote that Indian nations are "distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights."
But President Andrew Jackson chose not to enforce the court's decision. He said at the time: "The decision of the Supreme Court has fell stillborn, and they find that it cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate." He told the Cherokee that they would need to operate under the jurisdiction of the state of Georgia or else relocate. This was a step in the direction of what became known as the "Trail of Tears," when the Cherokee were removed from Georgia and moved to territory in Oklahoma.
Answer:
Geogia won but indians kept land
Explanation:
a potato famine in Africa forced millions of starving Africans into slavery
B.
the Spanish conquered Africa and took millions of Africans as slaves
C.
the Spanish needed a large army to defeat the Native Americans
D.
slaves were needed to work the sugar plantations
The correct option is D. African slavery was introduced to the Americas because slaves were needed to work the sugar plantations.
Sugar production and cane farming both required the labor of enslaved Africans. Slaves provided the massive amounts of labor needed for sugar production, working in the fields and boiling houses.
A group of around 20 enslaved persons that arrived at Point Comfort, Virgenia, close to Jamestown in August 1619, transported by British privateers who had taken them from a captured Portuguese slave ship, were the first Africans to reach the colonies that England was fighting to create.
Because sugar was a cash commodity that displayed economies of scale in cultivation and was best grown on big plantations with many workers, early sugar plantations made considerable use of slave labor. African immigrants were brought in and forced to labor on the plantations.
Thus, the correct option is D.
Learn more about Slavery in America here:
#SPJ2
The Supreme Court decisions in both cases held that the police may, in certain cases, search individuals or seize their property without a warrant. The Supreme court ruled that the police could conduct searches if they had probable cause and that the constitution does not prohibit that
Answer: The correct answer is : They argued that the police can in some cases register individuals or confiscate their property without the need for a court order.
Explanation: In the Terry v Ohio case, it was argued that when an officer suspects that a person may have a weapon, it is logical that he seek the weapons because of the danger he poses to himself and others. In the case Horton v California argues that when evidence is discovered it should not go unnoticed.