Explanation: The essential difference is that the democratic government is elected by the citizens, it is mostly an indirect so-called representative democracy. In such a state the government is in the service of the citizens and through the government the will of the citizens is expressed, individualism, the right to freedom and property are emphasised. Citizens in a regular election can change the government, so it is changeable and expresses the will of the people.
In an authoritarian state, the so-called government is subordinate to an authority that governs, abolish democratic rights, elections are conducted, but one knows roughly who will win, such elections serve to say that they are conducted and nothing more. This authority is one ruler with absolute authority, a dictator, and he subordinates all forms of government to himself. So it is a centralised government, usually assisted by a militia or army, and all other institutions that are supposed to work for the good of the people are abolished or have a parade role.
Answer:
there's not a draft anymore
Answer:
but why just because you live here doesn't mean you should risk your life and have the possibility of dying to come back and have nothing change
Explanation:
15 miles below Earth's surface.
25 miles thick.
25 kilometers thick.
Answer:
15 kilometres thick
Explanation:
This is the correct answer
No taxation without representation
They adapted this slogan because they were being taxes without sufficient representation in the parliament.
I hope that's help:0
Please rate :0
Thanks
A No, because the court does not have supplemental jurisdiction over the worker's claim against the owner-operator of the crane.
B Yes, because the claim arose from the same transaction or occurrence as the worker's claim against the power company.
C Yes, because all claims asserted arose from a common nucleus of operative fact.
D Yes, because the State B worker has sufficient contacts with State A.
Answer: No, because the court does not have supplemental jurisdiction over the worker's claim against the owner-operator of the crane.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided, the federal court doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction over the worker's claim against the owner-operator of the crane.
The reason for this is because the court does not have supplemental jurisdiction over the worker's claim against the owner-operator of the crane.
It should be noted that supplemental jurisdiction can't be used in the overriding of the requirements of the diversity jurisdiction.
The correct option is A.