How did the us population distribution change between the civil war and the 1920s

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

Answer:

US population distribution changed between the Civil War and the 1920s in a process known as "Great Migration", in which many African Americans migrated from the south to the north of the United States.

Explanation:

When the Emancipation Proclamation was signed in 1863 less than eight percent of African-Americans lived in the northeastern or midwestern states of the United States. As late as 1900 ninety percent of blacks lived in formerly slave states. The majority of this population would migrate to New York, Philadelphia, Boston, Buffalo, Baltimore, Minneapolis, Detroit, Chicago, Milwaukee, Kansas City, Columbus, St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Cleveland and Indianapolis, as well as many small industrial cities like Gary, Dayton, Toledo, Youngstown, Peoria, Muskegon, Omaha, Newark, Flint and Albany.

Between 1910 and 1930 the black population of the United States grew 40% in the northern states, concentrating this increase in the big cities such as Chicago, Detroit, New York, and Cleveland. This increase was greater during the 1910-1920 period. As the demographic changes occurred in the cities, there was an increase in tensions between African-Americans and the last remittances from European immigrants. Both groups came from eminently rural societies and disputed jobs and housing with the preexisting white working class. The majority of racial problems in this period were found among Irish descendants who defended their jobs from the competition of more recent immigrants and black internal immigration.

In the south the departure of hundreds of thousands of African-Americans reduced the percentage of the black population over the total. For example, in Mississippi, the black population fell from 56% to 37% between 1910 and 1970 and in South Carolina, the percentage fell from 55% to 30% in the same period.

Answer 2
Answer: City population grew rapidly as both immigrants and native born 

Related Questions

Which world history periodization fits with the Big History field of historical study?PLEASE HELP!!
To date, Uranus is known to have 13 rings made from which of the following?DustDark particles MoonsStars
What areas of medicine have benefitted from scientific and technological developments?
In what year was energy usage per capita in the united states the greatest?1973 1983 1992
What was the main target of the Kamikazes?

So what did Russia feel they had to do to prove themselves?-Protect the Slavic people
-Take over the Dardanelles
-Fight off the Ottomans
-Protect the Russians

Answers

Answer:

The Answer is gonna be -Protect the Russians

Answer: Protect the Slavic people

Explanation:

I just took the test and got it right

Which of the following was not one of the Roman Senate's powers in the early days?

Answers

The correct answer isexercise complete control over the common people or plebeians


please rate and thank : )

What was controversial about the election of 2000?A. Bush lost the popular vote but won the electrical collars with the support of a Supreme Court decision
B. Gore lost the popular vote but won the electrical college with the support of a Supreme Court decision
C. Bushveld to turn in the required paperwork making his candidacy Questionable
D. Gore denounced the election of corrupt and vowed to sue in court

Answers

The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "B. Gore lost the popular vote but won the electrical college with the support of a Supreme Court decision." the controversial about the election of 2000 is that B. Gore lost the popular vote but won the electrical college with the support of a Supreme Court decision

Answer:

III

Explanation:

In the Olympic Games of 1932, controversy arose due to the actions of an Italian athlete. a. True
b. False

Answers

It is not true that there was a controversy involving the actions of an Italian athlete. The controversy that happened during 1932 Summer Olympics was when nine time Finnish Olympic gold medalist Paavo Nurmi was prevented to compete for the marathon. Another controversy was caused by a Swedish equestrian named Bertil Sandstrom. 

Answer:

True

Explanation:

According to Odyssey (an online school) In the Olympic Games of 1932, controversy arose due to the actions of an Italian athlete is true

What effect does the omniscient narration have on the meaning and structure of the story "The Devil and Tom Walker?

Answers

In general, the omniscient narration of the story "The Devil and Tom Walker" has the effect of knowing what may come in the near future and reading the minds of characters. 

Answer:

In "The Devil and Tom Walker," Washington Irving describes how the devil strikes a deal with a petty and miserly man, Tom Walker, and the consequences of that deal. Irving uses a third-person omniscient point of view to tell the story. This point of view allows the author to give readers the private and intimate details about Tom’s life and character that would not have been discernable from any other point of view. For example, he describes Tom’s unhappy marriage:

Her voice was often heard in wordy warfare with her husband; and his face sometimes showed signs that their conflicts were not confined to words.

At the same time, Irving is able to distance himself from the story while dryly commenting on everything that happens. For example, he describes Tom’s new business:

In proportion to the distress of the applicant was the hardness of his terms. He accumulated bonds and mortgages; gradually squeezed his customers closer and closer, and sent them at length, dry as a sponge, from his door.

If the story was told in the first person point of view (by the protagonist Tom), the readers would get intimate but inaccurate details about the story because it would be twisted by Tom’s biases. Through the third-person omniscient point of view, the author is able to make important commentary on the hypocrisy and greed in American society.

Explanation:

Which amendment resulted in U.S. senators being elected directly by the voting public? A.the 19th Amendment B.the 18th Amendment C.the 17th Amendment D.the 21st Amendment

Answers

Answer:

C.17th amendment

Explanation:

Final answer:

The 17th Amendment resulted in U.S. senators being elected directly by the voting public.

Explanation:

The amendment that resulted in U.S. senators being elected directly by the voting public is the 17th Amendment.

Before the 17th Amendment, senators were chosen by state legislatures. The 17th Amendment, ratified in 1913, changed the method of electing senators to a direct popular vote.

This amendment was adopted to give citizens a more direct role in the election of senators and to reduce corruption and political interference in the selection process.

Learn more about the 17th Amendment here:

brainly.com/question/33941322