True or false : The Doctrine of Nullification stated that the individual states did not have to obey Federal laws.

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: This statement is true
Answer 2
Answer:

Answer:

true

Explanation:


Related Questions

What was the purpose of the Vietnamization policy?
Which group believed that failure to approve the constitution would lead to mob rule and chaos?
What does it mean that the council of 500 was chosen "by lot"?Was it good idea Athen government
In what way did the Great Depression alter South Carolina’s population?A The population increased because more people were living longer. B The population increased because people moved to the state to find work. C The population decreased because of the declining birthrate among farmers. D The population decreased because people left the state to find work.
What body of water did the Seminoles cross on their route to the Indian Territory

Which of the following best describes the advancements of the New Stone Age?a.

using tools

c.

using seeds to grow crops
b.

gathering food

d.

using fire to cook food

Answers

Using seeds to grow crops best describes the advancements of the New Stone Age.

Answer:

Using seeds to grow crops best describes the advancements of the New Stone Age.

Explanation:

Mark each statement if it correctly describes events that led to the fall of Rome.A.
The Eastern Empire gained strength while the Western Empire grew weaker.

B.
Invasions along the borders of the empire created chaos.

C.
The Roman army was strong, but was still unable to defend Rome from the Visigoths.

Answers

"C. The Roman army was strong, but was still unable to defend Rome from the Visigoths" correctly describes events that led to the fall of Rome, although there were internal issues as well.

The correct answers are A and B, here is a brief explanation of each one of them:

A. The fate of Rome was partially sealed at the end of the third century, when Emperor Diocletian divided the Empire into two halves - the Empire of the West, based in the city of Milan, and the Empire of the East in Byzantium, later known as Constantinople. The division made the empire more easily governable in the short term, but over time the two halves were moving away.  The West and the East failed to work together adequately to combat external threats, as well as constantly disagreeing on military resources and aid. As the distance increased, the Empire of the East, where the majority of the population spoke Greek, enriched, the West, which spoke Latin, fell into an economic crisis.  More importantly, the strength of the Eastern Empire served to divert the barbarian invasions of the West. Emperors such as Constantine ensured that the city of Constantinople was fortified and well protected, but Italy and the city of Rome - which had only symbolic value to many in the East - were vulnerable. The Western political structure would finally disintegrate in the fifth century, but the Eastern Empire somehow managed to resist for another thousand years before being conquered by the Ottoman Empire in the 1400s.

B. The barbaric attacks on Rome were partially the result of a mass migration caused by the invasion of the Huns into Europe in the late fourth century. When these Eurasian warriors invaded through northern Europe, they pushed many Germanic tribes to the borders of the Roman Empire.  On the contrary, the Romans allowed members of the Visigothic tribe to cross south of the Danube to find security in the empire's territory, but treated the migrants with extreme cruelty. According to historian Ammianus Marcellin, Roman officials even forced the hungry Goths to offer their children as slaves in exchange for dog meat.  By brutalizing the Goths, the Romans created a dangerous enemy within their own borders. When oppression became unsustainable, the Goths revolted, eventually killing the valiant emperor of the Eastern Empire during the Battle of Adrianople in AD 378. Shocked, the Romans negotiated a fragile truce with the barbarians, which ended in 410 when the Goth king Alaric went to the West and sacked Rome. With the Empire of the West weakened, Germanic tribes such as the Vandals and Saxons were able to cross the borders and occupy Britain, Spain and North Africa.

What is the legacy of the French revolution

Answers

3 of the legacies of the French Revolution are...

1 -Declaration of Right of Man and the Citizen equality of law
2- freedom of expression and religion
3- presumed innocent until proven guilty No longer would monarchs be secure in privileged positions

Which scientific advancement is linked to the Muslim scholar Al-Khwarizmi?
O A. He discovered new species of life on the ocean floor.
B. He developed a unified theory of quantum mechanics.
C. He transformed the field of particle physics.
D. He invented a new branch of mathematics, algebra

Answers

The correct answer is:

D. He invented a new branch of mathematics, algebra.

Explanation:

Al-Khwarizmi was a Muslim mathematician, astronomer and geographer, that is also known as the Father of Algebra, because he was the first to introduce letters to equations, as a sign of an unknown number to solve equations, and to treat Algebra as an independent science.

Al-Khwarizmi demonstrated the method to solve quadratic equations and proved the methods of reduction, known in Arab as Al-Jabr (the transposition of negative quantities to the other side of the equation to transform them into positive quantities) and balancing, known in Arab as Al-Muqâbalah (the elimination of identical quantities of both sides of the equation).

The answer is D hes a mathematician

Plz help. This is due by 12 tonight...Which answer correctly summarizes the case of Gibbons v. Ogden?

Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court case about federal taxation.
Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court case about state taxation.
Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court case about intrastate commerce.
Gibbons v. Ogden was a Supreme Court case about interstate commerce.

Answers

Gibbons v. Ogden was about int-ER-state commerce.  In particular it addressed the issue of steamboat navigation. 

How did Northerners and Southerners view abolition differently?

Answers

Northerners believed that abolition was the way to go because they thought people should not be treated like property and toil like slaves. All people were equal in their eyes, so they decided to treat people like that, especially Quakers and abolitionists.

Southerners, while there may have some abolition supporters (possibly), thought differently. They believed abolitionists were trying to take their sources of hard labor in the South: slaves. Southern slave masters wanted slaves to work for almost no pay and do the work they didn't want to do, so aboiliton was NOT something they really liked...