Answer:
jack
Explanation:
The characters in Lord of the Flies match to the descriptions as follows: Ralph blows the conch shell to call a meeting, Piggy has glasses and suffers from asthma, Jack believes he should be chief and has a golden badge, and Simon is recognized for his intelligence.
This question refers to the novel Lord of the Flies by William Golding. Here is how the characters match with the provided descriptions:
#SPJ2
In an argumentative essay, the counterclaim should be included in the essay's counterargument.
Answer:
Courage, Passion, Integrity, Confidence, Honesty, Caring
Explanation:
They normally portray these things, for example a superhero that helps his city (like batman)
a. Before this I was not unacquainted with the more obvious laws of electricity.
b. It seemed to me as if nothing would or could ever be known.
c. On this occasion a man of great research in natural philosophy was with us, and excited by this catastrophe...
d. ...he entered on the explanation of a theory which he had formed on the subject of electricity and galvanism, which was at once new and astonishing to me.
This is from Frankenstein. If you want, I can post the entire paragraph.
It seemed to me as if nothing would or could ever be known describes the changed feelings of the narrator. Option (b) is correct.
In order to control conduct, social or political entities make laws that are enforced.
The Narrator, a fictional character and the main antagonist. The character, an insomniac with a split personality, is portrayed as a nameless everyman during the daytime who transforms into the gregarious and chaotic Tyler Durden at night while experiencing bouts of insomnia.
An structured, cogent succession of sentences that are all related to the same idea is a paragraph.
Therefore, Option (b) is correct. It seemed to me as if nothing would or could ever be known.
Learn more about Law, here;
#SPJ3
Answer:
b. It seemed to me as if nothing would or could ever be known.
Explanation:
In the text, the narrator seemed optimistic about learning until this line.
Which verb correctly completes the sentence?
A) has marching
B) march
C) marches
D) marching
The verb which correctly completes the sentence is the following one:
c) marches.
An army of ants marches quickly across the sand.
In the sentence, the subject is "an army of ants", that is, a single army, therefore singular. Since the sentence is in simple present tense and is affirmative, as well as the subject is in third person singular (an army of ants marches= it marches), the rule of adding "s", "ies", or "es" to the verb applies. Since the main verb ends in "ch", "es" must be added to it.
Incase you're like me and dont trust anyone on here with answers, the person above is correct! I did the test!
Explanation:
hope it is helpful to you
B:a very small piece of material
C:the inside of a lightbulb
D:the vacuum inside a bulb
A very small piece of material is context clues, is the meaning of the word filament. Thus, option (b) is correct.
The term context clues refer to cues that help readers decipher a sentence, paragraph, or chapter, so they can understand the meanings of new or obscure words. The context was the written in the term are the proper manner in the format are the measured to be the followed. The sentence formation of the context are the complete.
According to the context clues, in the passage was the based on the meaning of the word filament. There was the meaning of the word are the situated to the very small piece of material. There was the piece of the material are the tiny.
Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on context clues, here:
#SPJ2
Answer:
b
Explanation: