Answer:
D.Many plantations were divided up and the land sold to Africans
Explanation:
After independence, most white settlers that owned plantations and huge pieces of lands that were under irrigation moved back to their countries.The governments that took turn became in charge of the plantations and farms though single individuals got hold of these plantations in a corrupt manner in the name of buying them.Eventually, most of these plantation farms collapsed due to mismanagement of funds and poor farming practices.
Answer:
Explanation:
After Cortés, conquistadors explored Central and South America to find gold and treasure. Pizarro conquered the Inca empire in South Americas in the 1530s. Conquistadors went north looking for gold. ... Spanish explorers were the first Europeans to see most of North America.
Answer: Agree with her friends, informational social influence
Explanation:
Jassie believes that the her friends are right due to social influence they have on her. Due to informational social influence, Jessie will agree to anything her friends says. This type of influence is also called social proof. A person exhibit it when they are amidst crisis or situation beyond their control, or when the situation is big and difficult to explain. It is mainly expressed when someone does not believe in herself especially in his capabilities, they tend to look at others.
Question Options;
a) disagree; informational social influence
b) disagree; normative social influence
c) agree; informational social influence
d) agree; normative social influence
Answer: Jessie, who is not absolutely sure of the race of the suspect is likely to AGREE with Paul and Adam because of the effect of INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE.
Explanation: Informational social influence refers to an act whereby an individual or people copy the actions of people because they believe someone else is right. It is also known as Social Proof and it was coined by Robert Cialdini in his 1984 book, Influence. It is a change in opinion or behavior when we believe others have the right or accurate information.
Jessie was not absolutely sure but because of the opinion of "others", Paul and Adam, she is likely to agree due to the phenomenon of INFORMATIONAL SOCIAL INFLUENCE.
b. focus more on individuals and their specific circumstances
c. have a stronger emphasis on sameness and wish to make people more similar
d. understand that many crimes are related to drug and alcohol addiction
Answer:
B. Focus more on individuals and their specific circumstances
Explanation:
Organic solidarity is a theory developed by Emile Durkheim which explains that it is the individual efforts of people that lead to a thriving society. Individuals, although different with their peculiarities contribute to growth through a network of interdependence.
Mechanical solidarity on the other hand attributes social cohesion to the sameness of individuals. Organic solidarity employs restitutive sanctions, while Mechanical solidarity employs repressive sanctions.
Organic solidarity, found in complex, modern societies, emphasizes the specifics of individual circumstances when it comes to social sanctions. They lean more toward rehabilitative social sanctions, with the aim for integrating individuals back into society.
The concept of organic solidarity and mechanical solidarity comes from the sociologist Émile Durkheim who used these terms to explain different types of societies. Organic solidarity is characteristic of modern, complex societies where people are interconnected through a web of different roles and professions. Such societies tend to have a greater emphasis on individuals and their specific circumstances, which informs their approach to social sanctions. Rehabilitative social sanctions are more common, as these societies understand that a punishment system needs to take into account the individual's unique circumstances, not just the act itself. These societies are generally interested in rehabilitating individuals and reintegrating them into society rather than simply punishing them.
#SPJ3
This question is incomplete, here´s the complete question.
Wei-Chin designed a self-report inventory to measure how intimate partners express affection and hostility toward each other. The inventory is a list of positive behaviors (e.g., back rubs, holding hands) and negative behaviors (e.g., slamming doors, raising voices). After having a wide range of couples complete the inventory, Wei-Chin finds that happy couples endorse all the affection items and unhappy couples endorse all the hostile items. Which of the following problems prevents him from concluding that happy couples exchange more affectionate behaviors than unhappy couples?
1. sentiment override
2. item-overlap problem
3. correlation does not imply causation
4. social desirability effect
Answer: 3. Correlation does not imply causation.
Explanation:
Correlation is a statistical technique that evaluates how much two variables are linearly related, meaning they change together. However, two variables being correlated does not necessarily mean that one causes the other. Causation states that any change in a variable will cause a change in another variable.
The fact that happy couples endorsed all the positive behaviors, and unhappy couples the negative ones, shows that there´s a correlation, but it doesn't necessarily mean that unhappiness causes couples to exchange more negative behaviors, or vice-versa.
Answer:
The greatest contribution that students should give to society is that of ideas. ... Students also contribute to society through the organisation of pressure groups especially in situations dealing with the needy and future generations such as the environmental issues.
Explanation:
Answer: