Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
To compare the fractions we require them to have a common denominator.
The lowest common multiple of 3 and 7 is 21
Change both fractions into fractions with a denominator of 21
and
= and
The numerator 14 is greater than 12, hence
is the larger fraction
Answer:
2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
To find whether a fraction is bigger than the other, we need to make the denominators the same.
First we see what number we can change 3 and 7 into, so it can be made the same.
I chose the number 21 as 21 is in the 3 times tables and the 7 times tables.
Then because I multiplied 3 by 7 to make 21 , I multiply the numerator which is 2 by 7 as well which is 14.
This makes 14/21.
We need to multiply the numerator of the other fraction to because we multiplied the denominator by 3 so we do 4 multiplied by 3, to make 12.
This makes 12/21.
We can see here that 14/21 is greater than 12/21, therefore 2/3 is greater than 4/7.
Your welcome!
B.544,320
C.604,800
D.10,000,000
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
A
B
C
D
Answer: B
Step-by-step explanation:
I. Probability that Dave is a rollerblader = 50%
II. Probability that Aimee does not have kids = 75%
III. Probability that Mitch is a rollerblader = 80.65%
The required, none of the statements are correct, as of the given conditions.
Probability can be defined as the ratio of favorable outcomes to the total number of events.
Here,
We are given a survey of a random sample of residents in a neighborhood who have kids and who also rollerblade. Let's denote the events as follows:
R: the event that a resident rollerblades
K: the event that a resident has kids
Based on the information given in the problem, we know that:
Dave does not have kids, so P(K) = 0 for Dave. Therefore, the probability that Dave is a rollerblader is 0, not 50%. So statement I is incorrect.
Aimee has never rollerbladed, so P(R) = 0 for Aimee. We don't know anything about whether Aimee has kids or not, so we cannot determine the probability that she does not have kids. So statement II is incorrect.
We don't have any information about whether Mitch has kids or not, so we cannot determine the probability that Mitch is a rollerblader. Therefore, statement III is also incorrect.
Therefore, none of the statements are correct.
Learn more about probability here:
#SPJ7
Answer:
1. dave has a low chance of rollerblading if he is focusing on his career.
Step-by-step explanation:
B. 2b โ 6
C. 2(b โ 6)
D. b รท 6
uarts = ____ cups