unwealthiness and sexual assualt, crime and drugs
Answer:
Its B ) The Federal deficit continues to rise...
Explanation:
The largest economic issues of the 1980s and 1990s "have been the Federal deficit and the Federal debt". The United States government has not had a balanced budget since 1969.
The deficit has been a hot political issue. Congress has several times passed legislation that planned to end the deficits within a specified number of years. However, the debt continues to rise. It has now reached into the trillions of dollars.
True
False
Answer:
The Israelites are the ethnic stock from which modern Jews and Samaritans originally trace their ancestry. Modern Jews are named after and also descended from the southern Israelite kingdom of Judah, particulary the tribes of Judah, Benjamin, Simeon and partially Levi.
Explanation:
Answer:
it is that they were immigrants
Explanation:
i learned that in 5th grade
Answer: Are these also your options?
Explanation:The examples of programs or projects most likely funded by taxes paid by citizens of the United States are:
- Constructing a highway: because they care about their infrastructure. They believe that highway is crucial for their transportation and the logistics of their products, supplies, etc.
- Collecting garbage: because their country is one of the principal developers of garbage, and if they do not collect garbage their streets will collapse.
- Maintaining state parks: first of all, because they are protecting areas, so the state has to preserve them. And secondly, because they are an attraction for tourism.
Answer:
The answers are A B and E. Just took the test
Explanation:
A) The ruling determined that Congress could act against the president if it wished.
B) The ruling determined that the Supreme Court was more powerful than the president.
C) The ruling determined that laws that violated the U.S. Constitution could be thrown out.
D) The ruling determined that presidents could not remove judges appointed by their predecessor.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. The Supreme Court's ruling in Marbury v. Madison determined that laws that violated the U.S. Constitution could be thrown out.
Explanation:
Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.
The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.
If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.