Idk if im too late but its A. His empire became too large for him to control.
Explanation:
2.Slavery was legal above the 36-30 line.
3.California entered as a free state.
4.Missouri entered as a slave state.
5.Banned the slave trade in Washington, D.C.
6.All territories could vote on the issue of slavery.
7.Slavery was banned above the 36-30 line.
The Missouri Compromise consists of key parts: Missouri entering as a slave state paired with Maine as a free state; Slavery was prohibited north of the 36-30 line; The Louisiana Purchase territory was divided along these lines as well.
The Missouri Compromise signed in 1820 was a major legislative measure addressing the issue of the expansion of slavery in the United States. The key parts of the compromise are: 1. Missouri entered the Union as a slave state in conjunction with Maine entering as a free state to maintain the balance between slave and free states. 2. Slavery was effectively prohibited north of the 36-30 line (excluding Missouri). 3. The rest of the Louisiana Purchase territory was divided along a geographic boundary, where slavery was effectively banned north of the 36° 30′ line.
#SPJ6
The correct answer is A
Korematsu v. United States was a US Supreme Court case that led to the enactment of a landarmark decision in 1994. It was related to the constitutionality of the Executive Order 9066 that was issued during WWII and which forced US Japanese individuals (independently of their citizenship) into internment camps located all over the country.
The Supreme Court supported the US goverment this time, stating that the need to be protected against espionage overrode the provision of rights to US citizens with Japanese descent.
The correct option is (D) an executive order.
Further explanation:
In the United States, the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution was related to the “criminal procedure” implemented with the Bill of Rights of 1791. The amendment came into force in all the states both at the federal and central level. The Amendment granted that individuals shall not be enforced in an unlawful prosecution to be a witness upon himself and that neither an individual shall be deprived of life and freedom.
The amendment reinforced the exclusionary rule that holds that evidence disturbing it as a result of a Fourth Amendment, ordinarily intolerable at criminal prosecutions. “Korematsu v. The US” (1944) is one of the involving cases of the 5th Amendment, the Supreme Court in which, the ruling of the case was the main instance when the ‘Supreme Court’ applied criticism strictly to review racial discrimination.
The United States “exclusionary rule” is a power of constitution that is based on democratic law. This may be admitted as an occasion of a defensive rule expressed by the court to protect a representative right.
Learn More:
1. In a parliamentary system of representative democracy, the prime minister is appointed by the monarch. is elected by representatives chosen by the people. is the leader of the party that won the most seats in parliament. is elected directly by the people.
2. Why did Nazi Germany build concentration camps in Poland?
Answer Details:
Grade: Middle School
Chapter: Korematsu V. United States
Subject: History
Keywords: executive order, criminal procedure, Bill of Rights, federal and central level, Supreme Court, democratic law, court, discrimination
The Supreme Court did not believe Roosevelt was doing enough
The Supreme Court kept finding his policies unconstitutional
The Justices believed Roosevelt had become too powerful
Answer:
The Supreme Court kept finding his policies unconstitutional.
Explanation:
Answer:it is either
The Supreme Court kept finding his policies unconstitutional
The Justices believed Roosevelt had become too powerful
Explanation: because FDR became president during the great depression any and everything was up to him and the supreme court was think is is try to be almost like a dictator .
Answer:
Explanation:
An institution drawing membership from at least three sovereign states. Members are held together by formal agreements. There are intergovernmental organizations and nongovernmental organizations. They range in different purposes but have the same goal of cooperating internationally to work to solve or regulate problems. An example of an intergovernmental organization is the United Nations. Includes IGOs, INGOs and Supranationalism.