Which event in the play is a supernatural sign that both Romans and Elizabethans would have recognized as a bad omen? A.
the strange sightings and earthquakes in Rome

B.
Brutus's death

C.
the assassination of Caesar

D.
Brutus's suicide

Answers

Answer 1
Answer: I think is A the stange sightings and earthquakes in Rome
I'm glad to help you

Related Questions

What role did the tigris and euphrates rivers play in the development civilizationA) they enriched the soil and helped farmers grow supplies surpluses.B) they enabled the people of mesopotamia to become sea traders.C) they provided enough water for farmers not to have to irrgate their crops.D) they isolated the people of mesopotamia from other religions.
Witch of the following people helped steel become a major industry in the United States?
Loyalists believed PatriotsQuestion 8 options:A.were breaking the law.B.should support British taxation.C.should return to England.D.were too aristocratic.
PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME!!!Who bases conclusions on hard evidence? A. archaeologist and psychologist B. historian and psychologist C. historian and archaeologist
What kind of military force did the confederation government have?

Here is your goal for this assignment:Write a report explaining how regional differences and sectionalism added to the problem of slavery

Using an encyclopedia, the Internet, or other resources, research how regional differences and sectionalism added to the problem of slavery. Write an 800-word report explaining how these regional attitudes contributed to America's increasing dispute over slavery. Use proper spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
Whoever will answer this really good, I will give you the brainliest.

Answers

Regional differences between the North and South, including economic, cultural, and political disparities, exacerbated sectionalism over slavery. This sectionalism ultimately culminated in the Civil War, triggered by events like the election of Abraham Lincoln and the Dred Scott Decision.

The report explaining how regional differences and sectionalism added to the problem of slavery

Regional Differences:

The North and South had differing economies, with the North being industrial and the South being agrarian, relying on slavery.

Social and cultural distinctions between the regions influenced their attitudes toward slavery.

Political divisions emerged, with the North supporting a stronger federal government and the South favoring states' rights.

II. Sectionalism:

Various historical events and compromises, such as the Missouri Compromise, Nullification Crisis, Wilmot Proviso, Compromise of 1850, and Kansas-Nebraska Act, exposed and deepened sectional tensions.

The Compromise of 1850, while temporarily reducing tensions, failed to resolve fundamental differences between the regions.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act's introduction of popular sovereignty and the Dred Scott Decision further escalated sectional strife.

The election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 and subsequent secession of Southern states marked the climax of sectionalism, leading to the Civil War.

III. Escalation Toward Civil War:

The Dred Scott Decision, which declared enslaved people as property, increased animosity between North and South.

Abraham Lincoln's election as a Republican candidate opposing slavery's expansion led to Southern secession and the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861.

Learn more on the American civil war here brainly.com/question/1020924

#SPJ3

Answer: #1 .....Slavery is any system in which principles of property law are applied to people, allowing individuals to own, buy and sell other individuals, as a de jure form of property. A slave is unable to withdraw unilaterally from such an arrangement and works without remuneration. Many scholars now use the term chattel slavery to refer to this specific sense of legalized, de jure slavery. In a broader sense, however, the word slavery may also refer to any situation in which an individual is de facto forced to work against their own will. Scholars also use the more generic terms such as unfree labour or forced labour to refer to such situations.However, and especially under slavery in broader senses of the word, slaves may have some rights and protections according to laws or customs.

Slavery existed in many cultures, dating back to early human civilizations. A person could become enslaved from the time of their birth, capture, or purchase. Slavery was legal in most societies at some time in the past but is now outlawed in all recognized countries. The last country to officially abolish slavery was Mauritania in 1981. Nevertheless, there are an estimated 40.3 million people worldwide subject to some form of modern slavery. The most common form of modern slave trade is commonly referred to as human trafficking. In other areas, slavery continues through practices such as debt bondage, the most widespread form of slavery today serfdom; domestic servants kept in captivity; certain adoptions in which children are forced to work as slaves; child soldiers; and forced marriage.

Explanation: #2 ...... in the UK.... Sectionalism occurs in the United Kingdom, most notably in the constituent country of Scotland, where various sectionalist/separatist political organisations and parties have existed since the early 1920s, beginning with the Scots National League. Today, Scottish sectionalism is most strongly associated and advocated by the Scottish National Party(SNP), which can be described as both sectionalism and separatist. The SNP advocates for both Scottish independence and more autonomy for Scotland while remaining a part of the United Kingdom.

#3 In the US......Sectionalism in 1800s America refers to the different lifestyles, social structures, customs, and the political values of the North and the South. Regional tensions came to a head during the War of 1812, resulting in the Hartford Convention which manifested Northern dissatisfaction with a foreign trade embargo that affected the industrial North disproportionately, the Three-Fifths Compromise, dilution of Northern power by new states, and a succession of Southern Presidents. Sectionalism increased steadily in 1800–1850 as the North industrialized, urbanized and built prosperous factories, while the deep South concentrated on plantation agriculture based on slave labor, together with subsistence farming for poor whites who owned no slaves. Southerners defended slavery in part by claiming that Northern factory workers toiled under worse conditions and were not cared for by their employers. Defenders of slavery referred to factory workers as the "white slaves of the North".

Meanwhile, Northern industrialists and workers benefited from the slave system, even as some westeners politicians and religious leaders denounced it. The South expanded into rich new lands in the Southwest (from Alabama to Texas). However, slavery declined in the border states and could barely survive in cities and industrial areas (it was fading out in cities such as Baltimore, Louisville and St. Louis), so a South based on slavery was rural and non-industrial. On the other hand, as the demand for cotton grew the price of slaves soared, as slaves were considered imperative for the harvest and refinement of cotton. Historians have debated whether economic differences between the industrial Northeast and the agricultural South helped cause the Civil War. Some historians now disagree with the economic determinism of historian Charles Beard in the 1920s and emphasize that Northern and Southern economies were largely complementary.

Historians do agree that social and cultural institutions were very different in the North and South. In the South, wealthy men owned all of the quality land, leaving poor white farmers with marginal lands of low productivity. Fears of slave revolts and abolitionist propaganda made the South militantly hostile to suspicious ideas. Members and politicians of the newly formed Republican Party were extremely critical of Southern society and argued that the system of free labor in place in the North resulted in much more prosperity. Republicans criticizing the Southern system of slavery would commonly cite the larger population growth of the Northern states, alongside their rapid growth in factories, farms, and schools as evidence of the superiority of a free labor system.

1. Why is knowledge of early Americans limited?

2. What was the Iroquois Confederacy?

Answers

1) they all spoke in a different language & a majority Have perished so you can’t tell a story if you can’t read or understand it because of the language . 2)the confederacy was basically a pact made by the Iroquois Indians of every tribe stating that regardless of they like each other or not (which in most cases each tribe had an issue with one another) they vowed to all put their differences aside to fight their enemy if attacked. Basically come together to fight their enemy . Teamwork . It was pretty much an alliance they made in order to ensure their safety because they knew they were stronger together .

Who was the shortest president in the united states ?

Answers

james madison he was 5,4

What is two major steps in Napoleans climb to power

Answers

Napoleon's rise to power as meteoric. He was born in 1769 and studied about the military; he was later to be commissioned as a French artillery officer and attained heroic status at the siege of Toulon. [ [ [ He was in the fore front of 1799 Coup against the directory and was made first Consul and declared himself an emperor and was coroneted as the King of Italy in 1805.
Napoleon  Had a couple major steps to climb to power. 1. He rises in the French Army after the French revolution. 2. He takes command of a new French Army in Italy. 

I HAVE PUT THIA QUESTION 6 TIMES 6 TIMES OKAY AND NOBODY ANSWERD MY QUESTION PLEASE CAN SOOME INTELLGENT HELP ME AT LEAST ONE TIME IN MY LIFE !!!!If your freedom was in jeopardy, what would you be willing to sacrifice? Be honest. The truth is that sometimes it is better to play it safe. Sometimes it is better to risk. How do you know which choice to make?

Answers

I would be willing to sacrifice maybe my treasure. It's better to risk. No money, no freedom. If you have no freedom, what's the point of having money. You can't spend it. So pay money, your freedom is rewarded. You will know which choice to choose by weighing the pros and cons. Cons are what you don't want to happen to you. Pros are what you benefit. This is how you would know which choice to make.


Hope this is what you are asking and hope it helps!
I would give up my clothes my shelter anything to be free at that time  and you have to decide by your own instincts whether it is safer to be safe or risk

What was the main goal of supporters of “Manifest Destiny” in the 1840s?

Answers

Answer:  The main goal was the push westward.

Explanation:  Both government and individual felt nothing should stop the all-powerful drive to expand the size of the country.

Final answer:

Manifest Destiny was a belief that drove U.S. territorial expansion across the North American continent in the 19th century. Supporters sought to extend America's reach coast to coast, resulting in the annexation of Texas, the Mexican-American War, and the Oregon Treaty with Britain.

Explanation:

The main goal of supporters of “Manifest Destiny” in the 1840s was to expand U.S. territory across the continent to the Pacific Ocean. This doctrine was based on the belief that America was destined by God and by nature to stretch from coast to coast, covering the entire North American continent.

This belief led the U.S. to annex Texas and gain territory from Mexico in the Mexican-American War, resulting in the acquisition of what is now the southwestern United States. It also played a part in the Oregon Treaty with Britain, which secured the U.S. claim to the Pacific Northwest.

Overall, Manifest Destiny was a deeply influential ideology that drove American expansion in the 19th century, manifesting not only in territorial conquest, but in cultural and economic dominance as well.

Learn more about Manifest Destiny

brainly.com/question/26306734

#SPJ6