Hi there!
1. The correct answer is letter A) Orwell himself.
2. The correct answet is letter C) Disgusted and ashamed.
Explanation:
In this George Orwell's essay, the main idea is Orwell's contradiction to imperialism and how the society force an individual to act according to its ideals. This essay recounts the story, apparently of Orwell himself, when he was around twenty years old during which he has to decide if he kills an elephant or not. Around that age, he spent five years as a British police officer in Burma and, one day when an elephant broke loose, the Burmese ask him to kill the elephant, but he does not want to do it and he does not want to look like a fool in front of the Burmese. Still, he feels oppressed by society and its ideals, he says "When the white man turns tyrant, it is his own freedom that he destroys" inferring that when you give in to do what society says, you lose your freedom and essence. Here, Orwell himself is the dominant symbol, reflecting what society "asked him" todo against his ideals, he gifts his own freedom to society and he feels ashamed and disgusted of what he just did.
3. The correct answer is letter A) Competitive nature.
Explanation:
In Eveline, even tough she had paralysis, Eveline is figuratively in irons, a prisoner of her religious servility and her self-deception that she must stay to protect her brother and help her father.
In The Rocking-Horse Winner, the conflict is one of man against society or life in the sense that Paul must obtain enough money so that the family can have the life that they want to have.
These two main characters wanted to go against nature.
The dominant symbol in 'Shooting an Elephant' is the elephant, which represents the colonial burden. Orwell feels disgusted and ashamed of his actions in the story. In both 'Eveline' and 'The Rocking-Horse Winner', the main characters face inner conflicts due to their strong sense of duty.
1. The dominant symbol in George Orwell's 'Shooting an Elephant' is indeed the elephant (option d). The elephant represents the colonial burden and the uncontrolled force of nature and fate.
2. Based on the details and tone of 'Shooting an Elephant,' Orwell feels disgusted and ashamed (option c) of his actions as a British police officer in Burma when an elephant broke loose which is reflective of his criticism of colonial imperialism.
3. The inner conflicts faced by the main characters in both 'Eveline' and 'The Rocking-Horse Winner' spring from their strong sense of duty (option b). Duty and responsibility towards family are major themes in both of these stories leading to the inner conflict.
#SPJ6
B.You have used the word separate 10 times and spelled each usage differently!
C.You have used the word "separate" 10 times and spelled each usage differently!
Answer:
Dahmer was careful to kill his victims in a manner that minimized his chances of being caught suggesting that he recognize or appreciated that his behavior was bad/wrong and could control it
Explanation:The American Law Institute model stated that this kind of behaviour called insanity can be referred to as an individual is not accountable or responsible for criminal offence only if at the time the crime/offence was committed as a result of mental disease/defect he lacks considerable/essential capacity to recognize the essence of his crime or restrict his conduct to the rule of law.it is largely known to be one of the slightest victorious and accomplishing defenses of a criminal defense case and it is a very challenging work.
The Brawner rule states that:
"A person is not responsible for criminal conduct if at the time of such conduct as a result of mental disease or defect he lacks substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law."
Anyone could clearly see that the Milwaukee Monster had the mental capacity to have killed and raped that many people... According to an article published on "The New York Times" , Dahmer "Had taught himself to live behind a mask of normalcy that hid his often contradictory emotions.".
So yes, Dahmer had emotional problems -- but not ones that left him mentally inept. Therefore, he was completely sane when he committed these grisly acts.
Answer:
Chorus.
Explanation:
William Shakespeare's "Romeo and Juliet" revolves around the tragic love story of two young lovers. The story deals with themes of love, family, loyalty, patriarchy, death, etc.
The given lines "from forth fatal loins of these two foes, A pair of star-crossed lovers take their life" are taken from the Prologue of the story. Said by the Chorus as a prologue, the lines talk of how the "two foes"- the Montagues and the Capulets will produce two "star-crossed lovers". And because of that enmity between their families, they will take their life.
Thus, the correct answer is the Chorus.
1910-
1920-
1930-
Answer:
PRECEDENT
Explanation:
Justice Black uses a form of legal reasoning known as precedent. This process involves citing previous legal decisions to support a particular argument or decision in a case. Specifically, Justice Black uses Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. as a precedent to argue against the majority decision in Tinker v. Des Moines.
When Justice Black refers to Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. in the dissenting opinion for Tinker v. Des Moines, he is utilizing a form of legal reasoning known as precedent. A precedent is an existing legal decision that courts turn to when making rulings on similar issues or cases. When a judge uses precedent, they are looking at past rulings to guide them in their decision-making process for the case they are currently working on.
Using precedent, or citing a previous judgment, gives a foundation to the legal argument being made. Precedent is particularly impactful in a legal dissenting opinion because it gives credibility to the argument and draws attention to past interpretations of the law that support the viewpoint being put forth.
For instance, in Tinker v. Des Moines case, Justice Black used Giboney v. Empire Storage & Ice Co. to argue that the court's allowance for symbolic speech in the form of wearing black armbands in school did, indeed, constitute a 'real' disruption of school activities – contrary to the majority opinion. He thus believed that the ruling was in violation of the precedent set by Giboney.
#SPJ5