Which action by the U.S. government did this speech justify?
A. Forced assimilation
B. Forced removal of the Cherokee from Georgia
C. Settlers breaking treaties in the Indian Territory
D. Settlers paying the Native Americans for land rights
Answer:
B. Forced removal of the Cherokee from Georgia
Explanation:
This paraphrased excerpt is from President Andrew Jackson's Message to Congress on The Indian Removal Act that the Congress had approved.
Under this Act, Jackson was authorized to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes, consisting mainly of the Cherokee, in exchange for their ancestral homelands located in Georgia. In reality, Jackson enforced this act not as a form of negotiation with the tribes, but as a violent removal of the tribes, especially of the Cherokee that refused to leave from Georgia to Western Lands.
In the speech, the President is referring to that act and the forced removal of the Cherokee from Georgia and uses those word in order to justify the government's actions. Jackson sees the government's policies as liberal, generous and kind because the removal was in the Indians' best interests: it would save them from extinction and it would free them from the power of the States.
Mediterranean Sea
B.
Nile River
C.
Red Sea
D.
Dead Sea
Ferdinand Magellan is sometimes seen as controversial due to his attempts to convert locals to Christianity, the failure of his mission after his death, and the competition between Portugal and Spain that his route to the Spice Islands stirred. However, he is still remembered today with monuments and other references.
Saying Ferdinand Magellan is not worth defending could be related to various reasons. He attempted to convert people to Christianity in territories he discovered, which not everyone finds commendable. He pledged to assist Rajah Humabon, the ruler of Cebu, in defeating a rival ruler, Lapulapu, and lost his life in the Battle of Mactan. After his death, his remaining crew abandoned their mission in the Philippines and returned to Spain, suggesting a failure to establish lasting connections with the locals.
In seeking an alternate route to the Spice Islands, Magellan's funding came from the Spanish king after being turned down by the Portuguese. Despite his initial dreams, Magellan’s expedition led to conflict and competition between Portugal and Spain, culminating in the signing of the Treaty of Zaragoza in 1529 to divide Pacific territories between the two nations.
Despite the controversies, Magellan's legacy persists in today's world. Monuments and references to him exist in the Philippines and elsewhere. However, his actions during his expeditions might cause some to question whether he is worth defending.
#SPJ3
Who ever answers right get brain thing
Answer:
well for starters women's rights changed over time due to lack of Education, low literacy rates and inefficient or unfair incomes in the workforce.
In Tinker v. Des Moines, the Supreme Court ruled that the wearing of a black armband in protest of the Vietnam War was not a substantial disruption of the school environment and was therefore protected speech.
It is the first major case to determine the speech rights of students.
In Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, the Supreme Court placed a limit on the speech rights of students when it ruled that it was permissible for a school to censor the actions of a school newspaper.
This is important as it provides a limit on the speech rights of students.
At issue in both cases are how the speech is disruptive to the school environment and many cases since then have hinged on the importance of the speech (protest in Tinker v. spreading gossip in Hazelwood) and the manner in which the speech is undertaken.