Judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion by the fact that the dissent uses cases with similar conclusions as support and the correct option is option D.
In judicial reviews, both the majority opinion and the dissenting opinion analyze and interpret the law to determine the constitutionality or legality of a particular issue. However, they often arrive at different conclusions.
In the majority opinion, the justices who form the majority provide the legal reasoning and rationale for their decision. They typically rely on legal principles, precedents, constitutional interpretation, and sometimes public policy considerations to support their conclusions. The majority opinion sets the legal precedent for future cases.
On the other hand, in the dissenting opinion, justices who disagree with the majority decision present their own analysis and reasoning. The dissenting justices may use cases with similar conclusions to argue against the majority's interpretation of the law. They may highlight inconsistencies in the majority's reasoning or provide alternative interpretations of the law.
Thus, the ideal selection is option D.
Learn more about Judicial reviews, here:
#SPJ5
Conseil, Land, Farraggut. I had this on a test as well.
Mars and Earth
B.
Mercury and Mars
C.
Venus and Mercury
D.
Mercury and Earth
Report·Wed
This is false!
Sometimes the teacher will even tell you to make notes of all of your old activity's .
I hoped this helped <3
B. eat
c. argue
D. relax
Answer:
The correct answer is option A.
Explanation:
Collaborative discussion helps students to know more about a topic since they work in groups generally by using an online platform.
Before coming to a collaborative discussion it is important to search for information as regards the topics to be discussed. The more you understand and know about the topic, the more useful your participation will be.