Which of the following statements is true of taking responsibility

Answers

Answer 1
Answer:

There are no statements listed. For me taking responsibility means the willingness to admit one’s fault when things go wrong.  It is difficult to do but for those who do so without hesitation, speak a lot about their character for they willing to face the consequences of their actions.  


Related Questions

How do I rewrite 3x+2y-4=2(5-y) so that y is a function of x?
A ball is dropped from a certain height. The function below represents the height f(n), in feet, to which the ball bounces at the nth bounce:f(n) = 9(0.7)n What does the number 0.7 represent? The ball bounces to 30% of its previous height with each bounce. The height at which the ball bounces at the nth bounce is 0.3 feet. The ball bounces to 70% of its previous height with each bounce. The height from which the ball was dropped at the nth bounce is 0.7 feet.
An athlete eats 75g of protein per day while training. How much protein will she eat during 23 days of training? Write your answer in kilograms.
Help me please! asdjadahasddhasldassdassa
Compare using <, >, or =. 11/2____1

How do you find the value of x or y so that the line through the points has a given slope?

Answers

     We can make a linear equation system to deduce it.

\left \{ {{y_1=ax_1+b~(I)} \atop {y_2=ax_2+b~(II)}} \right. \n \n (II)-(I): y_2-y_1=a(x_2-x_1) \n \n \boxed {a= (\Delta x)/(\Delta y) }
ok so if you had the points
(x1,y1) and (x2,y2)
slope=rise/run so
slope=(y2-y1)/(x2-x1)

A circular track has a circumference of 1/4 mile. What is the radius?

Answers

The formula for circumference is C = 2 \pi r. We know the circumference and therefore we can plug that into the formula and solve for the radius.

(1)/(4) = 2 \pi r

Lets divide by 2 first.
(1)/(8)= \pi r

Next, lets divide by pi.
(1)/(8 \pi)= r
Thus the answer is (1)/(8 \pi) of a mile, which is approximately (1)/(25.13) of a mile.

What are two contributions to math that Leonardo Fibonacci made

Answers

Fibonacci is famous for his contributions to number theory.

In his book, Liber abaci he introduce the Hindu-Arabic place-valued decimal systems and the use of Arabic Numerals  into Europe.He introduced the bar we use in fractions, previous to this, the numerator has quotations around it. The square root notation is also is Fibonacci method.

Kara is sorting buttons by lengths for a craft project.The line plot shows the length of each button.If Kara lines up all the 3/4-inche buttons,what would be the total length

Answers

Answer:

2(1)/(4) inches.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hi,

We see the plot line below, which shows that three crosses above (3)/(4) - inch buttons, that means we have three such buttons available with us.

To find their total lengths, we have two methods:

  • We can add the lengths of all buttons, that means add (3)/(4) thrice
  • Or simply multiply (3)/(4) by three.

(3)/(4) * 3\n = (3 * 3)/(4)\n= (9)/(4)

changing this improper fraction into a mixed fraction: 2(1)/(4) inches. will be the total length of three buttons lined up.

Jarred wants to buy a go-cart for $1,200. His part-time job pays him $160 a week. He has already saved $400. Which inequality represents the minimum number of weeks (w) he needs to work, in order to have enough money to buy the go-cart?

Answers

Hello!

The answer is:

MinimumNumberOfWeeks\geq5

Why?

First, we need to find the money that Jarred needs including the money that he has already saved.

MoneyNeeded=1200-400=800

So, Jarred needs $800.

If he earns $160 a week, we can find the minimum weeks he has to work in order to earn $800 following the next steps:

WeeksToWork=(MoneyNeeded)/(WeeklyEarn)=(800)/(160)=5

So, if he has to work at least 5 weeks to earn the total amount of money, it can be expressed by the following inequality:

MinimumNumberOfWeeks\geq5

Have a nice day!

Final answer:

Jarred has to save $800 more to buy the go-cart, that is $1,200 minus the $400 he already saved. If he earns $160 per week, the inequality representing the minimal number of weeks he has to work is: 160w >= 800. If we solve this inequality for w, we find that w must be equal or greater than 5 weeks.

Explanation:

This question is about solving inequalities. The cost of the go-cart is $1,200 and Jarred has already saved $400. That leaves him with $800 he still needs to save.

His job pays him $160 a week. Therefore, we can identify the inequality as 160w + 400 ≥ 1,200.

To determine the minimum number of weeks Jarred needs to work, we solve for w

Steps to solve:

  1. Subtract 400 from both sides of the equation to isolate the term with w: 160w ≥ 800.
  2. Divide both sides by 160 to solve for w: w ≥ 5.
  3. As you cannot work a fraction of a week, the minimum number of weeks he needs to work is 5.

Learn more about inequalities here:

brainly.com/question/32625151

#SPJ12

165 / 26 mixed fraction ​

Answers