The correct answer to this question would be D. Descriptive theory. Not A.
Answer:
B. associate the cereal with something good and create positive feelings about the cereal.
Explanation:
B. Transitional words and phrases
C. Subject-verb agreement
D. Pronoun-antecedent agreement
c. mystery
b. reference
d. content
b. Place quotation marks around “Running to Idaho.”
c. Place quotation marks around “Running to Idaho” and “Hiding in Arizona.”
d. The sentence is correct as is.
C, ´Put quotation marks around "Running to Idaho" and "Hiding in Arizona"as they refer to the titles of the story and article.´
Shannon grabbed for the lurching boat, only to miss and slip back into the raft.
"Thank you for the suggestion," she said grudgingly. "It saved our project."
"
Answer:
We had been working for months to restore the house to its original glory.
Explanation:
This is the sentence that would most likely function as the exposition in a story. In a story, the exposition refers to the background information that is introduced at the beginning in order to clarify aspects of the events, settings, characters or other narrative elements. The exposition allows the reader to make sense of the present events, as well as predict future ones.
B. To review the main points that were originally presented in the case
C. To familiarize themselves with cases that had opposite outcomes
D. To emphasize the importance of the judicial process in making a
The correct answer is A.
A precedent is a legal case that establishes what is called "principle or rule." This principle is used by the court when deciding later cases with similar issues or facts. This is because the Courts in the U.S. legal system wish to have consistent rulings in similar cases.
By relying on precedents, justices ensure consistency, predictability, and fairness in legal decisions, upholding the credibility of the judicial process. Here option A is correct.
Justices use precedents in majority opinions and dissents primarily to demonstrate that other cases with comparable circumstances have arrived at similar legal conclusions.
This practice is fundamental to the common lawsystem, which relies on the principle of stare decisis, meaning "to stand by things decided." By referencing prior cases, justices establish consistency and stability in legal interpretations.
It provides a framework for predicting how the law will be applied in similar situations. This approach also respects the principle of fairness and equality before the law, as it ensures that similar cases are treated similarly. Here option A is correct.
To learn more about justices
#SPJ6