Hand-written letters from your great-great grandmother about her immigration
A story in People Magazine about the importance of family connections
The Wikipedia entry on genealogy and the role of genes in one’s family
If you are working on a research project in which you must present a short documentary film about the history of your family, The source that would be considered most credible for this project is option B.
Hand-written letters from your great-great grandmother about her immigration.
Those letters will provide too much significant and useful information, data and description pertaining to the history of your family, Every source that comes from any member of the family, especially ancestor will add reliable, credible and accurate proves to what you are going to present in your documentary.
The source which would be considered most credible for this project is hand-written letters from great-great grandmother about her immigration.
This is used to retrieve information about a subject topic in a way that is true and without bias.
The most appropriate credible source about a person's family history will be the one told by a family member which is why option B was chosen.
Read more about Credible sources here brainly.com/question/1279931
#SPJ5
Hypothetical evidence is evidence in which we ask the question what would happen in case something else was to happen. An example of this would be: "What would have happened if he had crashed the car?" You are creating a hypothetical situation to support your argument using "if".
Explanation:
Practical claims preceded by an "if" comment - request the issue when they're used as the solid proof in a discussion. That doesn't suggest that such testimony always presses the question, though: with real proof (empirical claims that stand on their own) or a persuasive abstract argument, hypothetical evidence can be sustained comparatively smoothly. It's just that you have to have the right original evidence or conceptual reasons,.
cadence
technical
style
Answer: Cadence
Cadence refers to the balanced, rhythmic flow of poetry or oratory. The term designates the rising and falling of the voice when reading a literary piece, or the changes in rhythm and pitch in poetry. Cadence sets the pace of a work. If the text has a rhythmic cadence, it can make it more persuasive. It can also make it easier for the speaker to hold the audience's attention.
I really think it is B. Cadence
Warm water is good for washing cars.
Answer:
Explanation:
Which sentence most effectively combines the meanings of these lines?
This work is regarded as a history rather than a diary.
Explain why.
You have to consider the typical elements of a diary.
A.
Regarding this work as a history rather than a diary, explain why you think so, and consider the typical elements of a diary.
B.
Since this work is regarded as a history rather than a diary, explain why you think this is so, and consider the typical elements of a diary.
C.
Considering the typical elements of a diary and regarding this work as a history rather than a diary, explain why.
D.
Considering the typical elements of a diary, explain why you think this work is regarded as a history rather than a diary
~bourgeois
~coddled
~despotic
~dubious
2)After hearing the raucous, cheering response to Adam’s speech, Mr. James feared that his new student body president might be an amateur_______
~demagogue
~despot
~enigma
~bourgeoisie
1)Because he was coddled as a child, Rob was a rather self-centered teenager.
Coddle- it refers to the act of treating someone with excessive or extreme kindness and care. Hence, in the above sentence, The word coddled suits best as, Rob was more self- centered that is always centering things around himself for own benefit. He was in such a way because since childhood he had been given excessive care and kindness because of which he can't relate with others out of care or kindness.
2)After hearing the raucous, cheering response to Adam’s speech, Mr. James feared that his new student body president might be an amateur demagogue.
Demagogue- It refers to a political leader who claims support by affirming with the popular desires rather than being rational and make judgments accordingly.