Maize is another word for corn.
In many languages, the word for corn is similar to the word "maize."
B)
Democratic
C)
Republican
D)
Reform
E) Whig
Abraham Lincoln was the first president elected by the Republican political party. Thus, option 'C' is the correct option.
Therefore, the fundamental initiator of the American Civil War was Lincoln's election. This was the first time a Republican had ever won the presidency. Map of the presidential election results. He quickly rose to prominence as the new Republican Party's leader. In the 1858 Senate campaign debates against Stephen A. Douglas, he attracted a wide audience.
In 1860, Lincoln ran for president and won by a landslide in the North. In 1860, Lincoln ran for president and won by a landslide in the North. His victory was seen as a danger to slavery by groups in the South, and Southern states started breaking away from the Union. At this time, the newly established Confederate States of America started taking southern government military installations.
Learn more about Abraham Lincoln, here:
#SPJ5
The correct answer is D. All of the above
Explanation:
The term "bandits" refer to individuals or groups of them known as gangs that were part of certain illegal activities. In the U.S. this included stealing cattle or any other goods in raches such as horses with stagecoaches, attacking people that live in the ranches and other violent acts especially in areas that are unsupervised. This type of illegal activities have existed during all history all around the world but became popular during the 19th and 20th century in the U.S. as there were multiple raids in Texas as a result of the conflict between Mexico and the U.S., in which Mexican rebels became bandits. Therefore, bandits do all of the above that include robbing stagecoaches, stealing cattle and attacking large ranches.
The answer will be D) All of the above :)
b. Russia, the U.S., and Austria-Hungary
c. Russia, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire
d. the prisoners of war
counterargument and a rebuttal.
Answer:
Imagining myself as a state delegate, I will make my complaint in the form of a letter.
Explanation:
Gentlemen
Due to the importance of creating the constitution for the success of our country, I decided to write this letter informing you of some concerns that I have to make myself want the constitution not to be ratified.
First, I believe that the constitution is unfair to some social groups. While recognizing the objective of you to establish a just, efficient government that promotes freedom and equality, the constitution does not have any guidelines in favor of women and blacks, who are extremely important to the country.
I recognize that the constitution does not hurt any of our rights as men responsible for maintaining and fighting for national sovereignty, but we cannot seek freedom just for us, even more so in a country that we establish freedom as its highest attraction, in addition to working to keep it.
By excluding women and blacks during the creation of the constitution, we are limiting these individuals to take advantage of all the privileges that our land can offer, in addition to presenting a contradictory constitution, as well as our thinking.
That said, I would like to ask that the constitution be edited before it is ratified, and I urge you to consider my suggestion.
Kind regards,
M.C.
Answer:
On the issue of ratifying the Constitution or not, I suggest that approving the Constitution is an efficient idea for the future of the United States. Our current problem of the balancing of state and federal power would be solved if we adapt the newly drafted constitution. It guarantees fair distribution of necessary and basic rights; protection of life, liberty, and property; and popular sovereignty. It also delegates a stronger, centralized power to the government, which could easily suppress violent uprisings and protect the citizens with its well-organized military power. We need a stronger government because of possible threats from other nations and internal conflict we are facing now. According to statesman Alexander Hamilton, a centralized national government with the ability to levy taxes is a fair balanced government; besides, the Constitution is open for interpretation. With the example of Shays’s Rebellion, the government under the Articles of Confederation was not able to hold down the rebellion due to a lack of military power. As a consequence, the United States population suffered massive casualties. Anti-federalists may say that ratifying the Constitution is risking popular freedom and sovereignty. However, the Constitution is “balancing” the powers, not usurping or taking away the power of the state to give the central government unlimited authority. Therefore, with all reasons being stated, I suggest that ratifying the Constitution would bring America more security and shared powers between the state and government, which would help create a more prosperous, balanced future for the United States.
Explanation: