The answer is Deductive reasoning that is a logical process in which a conclusion is based on the concordance of multiple premises that are generally assumed to be true.
Answer:
what you mean by this..um
In this analogy, the relationship between the pair of words 'sure' and 'ambivalent' is similar to the relationship between the words 'permanent' and 'temporary', as both pairs consist of antonyms.
The question you're asking is a form of analogical reasoning question, a type of question commonly seen in English and standardized tests, including the SAT. In the analogy 'sure is to ambivalent as permanent is to ?', the word 'sure' is on one end of the continuum and 'ambivalent' is on the other end. If 'sure' is the antonym of 'ambivalent', we then have to think of 'permanent' in a similar way, and find its opposite. Since 'permanent' means something lasting or unchanging, then its antonym would be 'temporary', something not lasting or subject to change.
So, 'sure' is to 'ambivalent' as 'permanent' is to 'temporary'.
#SPJ3
"No," I said. "No, I won't be here, not here on my daddy's land. One day I'll have land of my own. I've got to have something all my own."
Afterward the Missourian congratulated my daddy and paid him the wager. Other people came around and said Starburst was a mighty fine horse and that I was a fine rider too.
“But I still have to say no. I don't want this boy or the horse getting hurt. Like I said, my boy rides only horses he knows. I thank you, sir, though, for the offer."
The excerpt from "The Land" demonstrates the direct characterization of Paul would be as follows:
C). Afterward the Missourian congratulated my daddy and paid him the wager. Other people came around and said Starburst was a mighty fine horse and that I was a fine rider too.
Direct characterization is described as the way in which the author directly describes the personality or behavioral aspects of a character.
The third quotation most likely demonstrates direct characterization as it directly states the feature of a character through the other characters praising Starbust("a mighty fine horse...fine rider too").
Therefore, it informs the readers about the personality of that character clearly.
Thus, option C is the correct answer.
Learn more about "Characterization" here:
Answer:
Afterward the Missourian congratulated my daddy and paid him the wager. Other people came around and said Starburst was a mighty fine horse and that I was a fine rider too.
Explanation:
option 3
It means something is most important
"I dont need overshoes" said mitty
it was two blocks to the parking lot
an excited buzz ran around the court room
The answer is B: "I don't need overshoes" said Mitty.
Characterization is a literary device used to explain the details about a character in a story. It can direct or explicit (by the narrator, another character or the protagonist) and indirect or implicit (the audience deduce the characteristics of the character). Mitty's words and manner of communication is an indirect characterization.